Divergent validity of measures of cognitive distortions, impulsivity, and time perspective in pathological gambling
Divergent validity of measures of cognitive distortions, impulsivity, and time perspective in pathological gambling
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10899-006-9021-9
复制
发表时间：
2006-09-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Donovick, Peter J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MacKillop, James;Anderson, Emily J.;Donovick, Peter J.
本研究以三个样本为样本，以南橡树赌博量表得分[Lesieur，&Blume(1987)]为样本，评估了几种用于评估病理性赌博的自我报告和客观行为测量的不同效度。美国精神病学杂志，144,1184-1188]：病态赌徒、潜在病态赌徒和非病态赌徒。自我报告措施包括赌徒信念问卷[GBQ；Steenbergh，Meyers，May，&Whelan(2002)]。成瘾行为心理学，16,143-149]，赌博激情量表[GPS；卢梭，瓦勒兰，Ratelle，Mageau，&Provencher，(2002)。赌博研究杂志，18，45-66]，艾森克冲动问卷[EIQ；Eysenck，&Eysenck(1978)]。心理报告，43,1247-1255]，和斯坦福时间透视清单[STPI；Zimbardo，&Boyd(1999)]。人格与社会心理学杂志，77,1271-1288]。行为任务包括延迟折扣任务[Madden，Peter，Badger，&Bickel(1997)。《实验与临床精神药理学》，5,256-263页]和未来的时间展望[ftp；华莱士(1956)]。《变态心理学杂志》，52,240-245]。GBQ、GPS、EIQ的冲动性分量表和DDT都显示出稳健的发散效度，然而，时间远景的任何一项测量都不存在组间差异。这些发现的应用，病因学研究和临床背景进行了讨论。
The present study assessed the divergent validity of several self-report and objective behavioral measures for assessing pathological gambling using three samples divided by South Oaks Gambling Scale score [Lesieur, & Blume (1987). American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184-1188]: pathological gamblers, potential pathological gamblers, and non-pathological gamblers. Self-report measures included the Gamblers' Beliefs Questionnaire [GBQ; Steenbergh, Meyers, May, & Whelan (2002). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 143-149], the Gambling Passion Scale [GPS; Rousseau, Vallerand, Ratelle, Mageau, & Provencher, (2002). Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 45-66], the Eysenck Impulsivity Questionnaire [EIQ; Eysenck, & Eysenck (1978). Psychological Reports, 43, 1247-1255], and the Stanford Time Perspective Inventory [STPI; Zimbardo, & Boyd (1999). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288]. Behavioral tasks included the delay discounting task [Madden, Petry, Badger, & Bickel (1997). Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5, 256-263] and the Future Time Perspectives [FTP; Wallace (1956). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 52, 240-245]. The GBQ, GPS, Impulsivity subscale of the EIQ, and DDT all exhibited robust divergent validity, however, neither measure of time perspective discriminated between groups. Applications of these findings to etiological research and clinical contexts are discussed.