Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind?
Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.026
复制
发表时间：
2006-04-15
期刊：
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
Ladurner, G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aichhorn, M;Perner, J;Ladurner, G
评论[弗里斯，美国，Frith，C.D.，2003.心智化的发展与神经生理学。哲学翻译索科，B 358，685-694]的几项成像研究报告了内侧前额叶皮层（MPFC）在“心理理论”（ToM）任务中的稳健参与。令人惊讶的是，当判断另一个人的视觉视角时，这种激活明显不存在[Vogeley K.，May，M.，Ritzl，A.，Falkai，P.，Zilles，K.，Fink，G. R.，2004第一人称视角的神经相关性是人类自我意识的一个组成部分。J·科恩Neurosci. 16，817-827]。我们研究的目的是，当观察者所看到的东西之间的差异明显是一种视角（前面与后面），而不是观察者所看到的东西之间的潜在差异时，这种激活是否可以恢复。尽管有这种变化，MPFC仍然没有明显的激活。我们确实发现了颞顶连接（TPJ）的激活，最近强调这是处理错误信念故事的中心环节[Saxe，R.，Kanwisher，N.，2003.人们思考思考的人：颞顶结合部在“心理理论”中的作用。NeuroImage 19，1835-1842]，这也创造了一个鲜明的对比的观点。通过整合现有的心理加工理论的神经生理学证据，我们认为，TPJ区域的背侧部分负责代表观点的差异，并作出行为预测，而更腹侧的部分TPJ和MPFC区域负责预测行为后果和MPFC也情绪心理状态的后果。(c)2005年爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
Reviews [Frith, U., Frith, C.D., 2003. Development and neurophysiology of mentalising. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B 358, 685-694] of several imaging studies report robust involvement of medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in "theory of mind" (ToM) tasks. Surprisingly, this activation is notably absent when judging another person's visual perspective [Vogeley K., May, M., Ritzl, A., Falkai, P., Zilles, K., Fink, G.R., 2004 Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 817-827]. The objective of our study was to see whether this activation can be recovered when the difference between what observers see is clearly one of perspectives (in front vs. behind) and not potentially a difference in what observers are looking at. Despite this change, there was still no apparent activation of MPFC. We did find activation in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) recently emphasized as centrally involved in processing false belief stories [Saxe, R., Kanwisher, N., 2003. People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in "theory of mind". NeuroImage 19, 1835-1842], which also create a stark contrast of perspectives. By integrating extant neurophysiological evidence on theory of mind processing, we suggest that the dorsal part of the TPJ region is responsible for representing perspective differences and making behavioral predictions, while the more ventral part of TPJ and the MPFC region is responsible for predicting behavioral consequences and the MPFC also emotional consequences of mental states. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.