Assessment of a Worksite Health Promotion Readiness Checklist
Assessment of a Worksite Health Promotion Readiness Checklist
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/jom.0b013e3181efb84d
复制
发表时间：
2010-09-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Punnett, Laura
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Faghri, Pouran D.;Kotejoshyer, Rajashree;Punnett, Laura
目标：评估工作场所健康促进准备检查表 (WRCL) 的实用性，该清单旨在评估工作场所实施健康促进和健康保护计划的准备情况。方法：WRCL 在有（WHPy）和没有（WHPn）健康促进计划的工作场所进行了试点测试。在工作地点内部和工作地点之间比较 WHPy 和 WHPn 地点的 WRCL 评分（观察和管理）的两个部分，以确定 WRCL 的实用性和敏感性。结果：观察性 WRCL（由每个地点两名观察员完成）显示大多数项目具有较高的参与者间可靠性 (P < 0.05)。管理 WRCL（由每个站点的三名管理员完成）显示管理员之间存在一些不一致的响应。总体而言，WRCL 的两个部分都为 WHPy 站点产生了较高的分数。结论：WRCL 可能是衡量工作场所对健康促进和健康保护计划的准备情况的有效且可靠的工具。
Objective: To assess the utility of a Worksite Health Promotion Readiness Checklist (WRCL) designed to evaluate the worksite's readiness for implementing health promotion and health protection programs. Methods: The WRCL was pilot tested in worksites with (WHPy) and without (WHPn) health promotion programs. The two parts of WRCL scores (observational and administrative) for WHPy and WHPn sites were compared within and between the worksites to establish WRCL utility and sensitivity. Results: Observational WRCL (completed by two observers per site) demonstrated high interrater reliability (P < 0.05) for most items. Administrative WRCL (completed by three administrators per site) showed some discrepant responses between administrators. Overall, both sections of WRCL produced higher scores for WHPy sites. Conclusions: WRCL could be a valid and reliable instrument to measure readiness of a worksite toward health promotion and health protection programs.