Illiberal Socialism
Illiberal Socialism
复制标题
非自由社会主义
DOI：
10.5840/soctheorpract201440327
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Robert S. Taylor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Robert S. Taylor
：“自由社会主义”是矛盾修饰法吗？不完全是，但我将在这里证明，这是一个比学者们以前认为的更不稳定和更不寻常的混合体，几乎所有的自由主义者都应该拒绝社会主义，即使是最有吸引力的形式。更具体地说，我将表明，三种主要的自由主义--中立主义、多元完美主义和协商民主主义--甚至与温和形式的社会主义都不相容，即，社会主义市场经济。我的论文也将严重质疑罗尔斯的信念，即正义作为公平与自由社会主义是一致的。在一个运作良好的民主国家里，第一种是穆勒所说的“积极性格”--社会安排是可塑的，需要改进，个人的努力可以促进社会的改进。第二个是共同利益感，即根据共同利益进行判断的能力，以及根据这种判断采取行动的有效愿望。心理支持的论点认为，将自治扩展到传统上不民主的工作领域有助于形成积极的性格和发展共同利益感，从而有助于建立一个更充分的民主国家。60
: Is “liberal socialism” an oxymoron? Not quite, but I will demonstrate here that it is a much more unstable and uncommon hybrid than scholars had previously thought and that almost all liberals should reject socialism, even in its most attractive form. More specifically, I will show that three leading varieties of liberalism—neutralist, plural-perfectionist, and deliberative-democratic—are incompatible with even a moderate form of socialism, viz., associational market socialism. My paper will also cast grave doubt on Rawls’s belief that justice as fairness is consistent with liberal socialism. psychological in a well-functioning democracy. The first is what Mill called an “active character”—the sense that social arrangements are malleable and subject to improvement, and that one’s own efforts can contribute to their improvement. The second is a sense of the common good—the capacity to judge in terms of the common good, and an effective desire to act on such judgments. The psychological support argument holds that the extension of self-government into the traditionally undemocratic sphere of work contributes to both the formation of an active character and to the development of a sense of the common good, and thus contributes to a more fully democratic state. 60