Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them

Short Scales – Five Misunderstandings and Ways to Overcome Them
复制标题

短音阶——五种误解以及克服它们的方法

DOI:
10.1027/1614-0001/a000148
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
P. Kruyen
P. Kruyen
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Ziegler;Christoph J. Kemper;P. Kruyen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们对短心理量表了解多少? 《个体差异杂志》这期特刊的想法源于对短量表的共同兴趣,短量表被定义为用少于 10 个项目来衡量特定心理结构的量表。本期特刊的所有编辑最近要么积极参与短尺度建设(Kemper、Beierlein、Kovaleva 和 Rammstedt,2013;Ziegler、Kemper 和 Rammstedt,2013),要么评估该领域短尺度的现状(Kemper、Brahler 和 Zenger,2013;Kruyen、Emons 和 Sijtsma,2012, 2013a、2013b、2014)。根据与其他科学家关于短尺度的挑战和注意事项的讨论,他们感到非常有必要与更广泛的科学受众分享有关短尺度的当代问题。本期特刊汇集了从不同角度探讨短音阶主题的各种研究人员。我们的目标是通过汇集方法论、统计和构建导向的观点来解决有关构建、心理测量质量和短量表使用的一些误解和悬而未决的问题。我们的目标是促进有关实用性的持续辩论,以及有关使用短量表测量个体差异的注意事项。同时我们也希望能够消除一些现有的误解。
What do we know about short psychological scales? The idea for this special issue of the Journal of Individual Differences was born out of a common interest in short scales, defined as scales measuring a specific psychological construct with fewer than, say, 10 items. All editors of this special issue were recently either active in short scale construction themselves (Kemper, Beierlein, Kovaleva, & Rammstedt, 2013; Ziegler, Kemper, & Rammstedt, 2013) or evaluated the current status of short scales in the field (Kemper, Brahler, & Zenger, 2013; Kruyen, Emons, & Sijtsma, 2012, 2013a, 2013b, 2014). Based on discussions with other scientists about the challenges and caveats of short scales, they felt a strong need to share contemporary issues regarding short scales with a broader scientific audience. This special issue brings together a variety of researchers who have approached the topic of short scales from different angles. It is our ambition to resolve some misunderstandings and open questions regarding the construction, psychometric quality, and use of short scales by bringing together methodological, statistical, and constructionoriented perspectives. We aim at contributing to an ongoing debate regarding the utility as well as caveats concerning the use of short scales for the measurement of individual differences. At the same time we hope to dispel some existing misunderstandings.