The Argument-Based Approach to Validation
The Argument-Based Approach to Validation
复制标题
基于论证的验证方法
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Kane
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Kane
抽象的。在基于论证的有效性方法下，明确说明并有适当证据支持的测试分数解释和使用被认为是有效的。相反，没有明确定义或涉及可疑推论或假设的解释或使用不被认为是有效的。所提出的测试分数的解释和使用是根据从应试者观察到的表现到基于分数的结论和应试者决策的推论和假设（或论证）网络来指定的。然后可以根据网络的完整性和连贯性及其推论和假设的合理性来评估所提出的解释和使用的有效性。
Abstract. Under the argument-based approach to validity, test-score interpretations and uses that are clearly stated and are supported by appropriate evidence are considered to be valid. Conversely, interpretations or uses that are not well defined or that involve doubtful inferences or assumptions are not considered valid. The proposed interpretation and use of test scores are specified in terms of a network of inferences and assumptions (or an argument) leading from a test taker's observed performances to score-based conclusions and decisions for the test taker. The validity of the proposed interpretation and use can then be evaluated in terms of the completeness and coherence of the network and the plausibility of its inferences and assumptions.