Mentorship: a feminist critique of current research.
Mentorship: a feminist critique of current research.
复制标题
指导：对当前研究的女权主义批评。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Rosanna DeMarco
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rosanna DeMarco
互惠的专业护士关系称为导师制已经研究了在过去的十年中，从了解他们的角度来看，他们为什么工作，他们给每个参与者带来了什么。“知道”总是有它的局限性，因为我们，探究者，只能通过我们被展示的提问方式或在哪里提问来理解。如果个人是政治的，那么探索导师/门徒关系或护理实践或教育中的任何其他领域的护士，必须意识到影响我们在研究中选择的无意识偏见。从女权主义的角度来看，我们每个人都必须决定，至少，通过使用方法学来探索“了解”的替代方式，这些方法学在允许故事被分享而不是被报道的背景下参与女性的生活经历。本文是一个探索历史概念，当前相互支持的需求以及环境和背景经验的机会，这些经验可能是新方法的肥沃土壤，以了解我们如何在任何工作或学习的地方真正为彼此带来意义。
Reciprocal professional nurse relationships called mentorships have been researched over the last decade from the perspective of coming to know that they are, why they work and what they bring to each of the participants. 'Knowing' always has its limitations, since we, the inquirers, are only able to come to understand through the ways we have been shown to ask questions or where to ask them. If the personal is political, then nurses who explore mentorship/protégé relationships or any other area in nursing practice or education, must become aware of the unconscious biases which affect our choices in research. From a feminist perspective, each of us must decide, at least, to explore alternate ways of 'knowing' through the use of methodologies which engage women's lived experiences in a context which allows for stories to be shared and not reported. This paper is an opportunity to explore historical concepts, current needs for mutual support and the environmental and contextual experiences which may be fertile soil for new ways to understand how we can authentically bring meaning to each other wherever we work or study.