Comparative study of machine learning methods for COVID-19 transmission forecasting.
Comparative study of machine learning methods for COVID-19 transmission forecasting.
复制标题
COVID-19传播预测的机器学习方法比较研究。
DOI:
10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103791
复制
发表时间:
2021-06
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Sun Y
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dairi A;Harrou F;Zeroual A;Hittawe MM;Sun Y
Within the recent pandemic, scientists and clinicians are engaged in seeking new technology to stop or slow down the COVID-19 pandemic. The benefit of machine learning, as an essential aspect of artificial intelligence, on past epidemics offers a new line to tackle the novel Coronavirus outbreak. Accurate short-term forecasting of COVID-19 spread plays an essential role in improving the management of the overcrowding problem in hospitals and enables appropriate optimization of the available resources (i.e., materials and staff).This paper presents a comparative study of machine learning methods for COVID-19 transmission forecasting. We investigated the performances of deep learning methods, including the hybrid convolutional neural networks-Long short-term memory (LSTM-CNN), the hybrid gated recurrent unit-convolutional neural networks (GAN-GRU), GAN, CNN, LSTM, and Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM), as well as baseline machine learning methods, namely logistic regression (LR) and support vector regression (SVR). The employment of hybrid models (i.e., LSTM-CNN and GAN-GRU) is expected to eventually improve the forecasting accuracy of COVID-19 future trends. The performance of the investigated deep learning and machine learning models was tested using confirmed and recovered COVID-19 cases time-series data from seven impacted countries: Brazil, France, India, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and the US. The results reveal that hybrid deep learning models can efficiently forecast COVID-19 cases. Also, results confirmed the superior performance of deep learning models compared to the two considered baseline machine learning models. Furthermore, results showed that LSTM-CNN achieved improved performances with an averaged mean absolute percentage error of 3.718%, among others.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1007/s10489-020-01904-z
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Goel T;Murugan R;Mirjalili S;Chakrabartty DK
通讯作者:
Chakrabartty DK
影响因子:
7.8
作者:
Abbasi, Zohreh;Zamani, Iman;Ibeas, Asier
通讯作者:
Ibeas, Asier
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Dairi, Abdelkader;Harrou, Fouzi;Senouci, Mohamed
通讯作者:
Senouci, Mohamed
DOI:
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.08.015
发表时间:
2019-10-01
影响因子:
12.7
作者:
Barbat, Mauro M.;Wesche, Christine;Mata, Mauricio M.
通讯作者:
Mata, Mauricio M.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Cao, LJ;Tay, FEH
通讯作者:
Tay, FEH