New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research

New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/acm.0b013e31812f7956
复制
发表时间:
2007-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
Bulger, Ruth Ellen
Bulger, Ruth Ellen
中科院分区:
教育学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Heitman, Elizabeth;Olsen, Cara H.;Bulger, Ruth Ellen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的评估(1)新的生物医学科学研究生对负责任的研究行为(RCR)的核心概念和标准的基线知识,(2)研究生的基线知识总体上和跨研究诚信办公室的九个核心领域的差异,以及(3)这些差异中的人口统计学和教育因素。在对20篇美国出版的RCR文本进行内容分析后,结合研究生焦点小组提出的关于本科生RCR经验的人口统计学问题,开发了一个关于RCR核心概念和标准的计算机评分多项选择测试。四百两个新的研究生在三个健康科学大学被招募为Scantron和在线测试之前,开始RCR指令instruction.ResultsTwo一百五十一个402合格的学员(62%)在三所大学完成了测试,分数范围从26.7%到83.3%,平均为59.5%。只有7名(3%)参与者得分达到80%或以上。在美国以外接受本科教育的学生得分明显低于在美国接受本科教育的学生(平均52.0%)。S.本科学历(平均60.5%,P
PurposeTo assess (1) new biomedical science graduate students' baseline knowledge of core concepts and standards in responsible conduct of research (RCR), (2) differences in graduate students' baseline knowledge overall and across the Office of Research Integrity's nine core areas, and (3) demographic and educational factors in these differences.MethodA 30-question, computer-scored multiple-choice test on core concepts and standards of RCR was developed following content analysis of 20 United States-published RCR texts, and combined with demographic questions on undergraduate experience with RCR developed from graduate student focus groups. Four hundred two new graduate students at three health science universities were recruited for Scantron and online testing before beginning RCR instruction.ResultsTwo hundred fifty-one of 402 eligible trainees (62%) at three universities completed the test; scores ranged from 26.7% to 83.3%, with a mean of 59.5%. Only seven (3%) participants scored 80% or above. Students who received their undergraduate education outside the United States scored significantly lower (mean 52.0%) than those with U. S. bachelor's degrees (mean 60.5%, P