1. Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events
1. Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events
复制标题
1. 事件的词汇化意义和内部时间结构
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Malka Rappaport Hovav
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Malka Rappaport Hovav
本文讨论的问题是四向Vendler分类是否适用于动词或VP。本文认为，Vendler的分类不适合作为动词的分类，并对决定动词体势的词汇化意义要素进行了不同的分类。它强调了一类具有词汇编码标度的动词的重要性，说明了一大类标量动词不能一劳永逸地归类为活动、成就或成就，尽管词汇编码标度解释了这些动词的大部分体行为。探讨了词汇化标尺的体意义和句法意义。词汇化标度的动词类别被示出为不同于选择增量主题的动词类别。这在语义上和句法上都是合理的。似乎有更多的理由在副总裁一级承认四向Vendler分类，尽管有证据表明成绩没有统一的内部时间结构，主要是因为递增结构的来源不同。
This paper addresses the question of whether the four-way Vendler classification is appropriate for verbs or VPs. It suggests that the Vendler classification is not appropriate as a classification of verbs, and offers a different classification for the elements of lexicalized meaning which determine the aspectual potential of verbs. It highlights the importance of a class of verbs with a lexically encoded scale, illustrating that a large class of scalar verbs cannot be classified once and for all either as activities, accomplishments or achievements, though the lexically encoded scale accounts for most of the aspectual behavior of these verbs. The aspectual and syntactic significance of a lexicalized scale is explored. The class of verbs lexicalizing a scale is shown not to be the same as the class of verbs selecting an incremental theme. This is justified both on semantic grounds and on syntactic grounds. There appears to be more justification for recognizing the four-way Vendler classification at the VP level, though it is demonstrated that accomplishments do not have a uniform internal temporal structure, predominantly because of the variety of sources of incremental structure.