Inducement, due and otherwise.
Inducement, due and otherwise.
复制标题
诱导、到期诱导和其他诱导。
DOI：
10.2307/3564325
复制
发表时间：
1982
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Newton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Newton
我的自由受到限制，我同意的能力被破坏，我可能签署的任何合同，大概都是无效的，或者由我选择。这种说法在直觉上是不可信的。这就好像大学的首席财务官应该争辩说，在教师工资谈判期间，工资水平的“不适当”提高会损害教师自由同意的能力，并使教师合同无效或无效。这可能是他的办公室尚未提出的唯一论点;我想我不会提请他注意。教师工资委员会对任何这样的论点的反应是可以想象的。就此而言，任何一个“正常、健康”的人，对于雇主对“自由”的关怀，对保持低工资的便利，都会有什么反应，这是可以想象的。从被引诱的人的角度来看，没有任何引诱是过高的。
my freedom is limited, my capacity to consent destroyed-and any contracts I may sign, presumably, void or voidable at my option. The claim is intuitively implausible. It is as if the University's Chief Financial Officer should argue, during faculty salary negotiations, that an "undue" raise in the salary level would damage the faculty's ability to consent freely, and render the faculty contracts void or voidable. That may be the only argument to that effect that has not yet been advanced by his office; I think I shall not bring it to his attention. The reaction of the Faculty Salary Committee to any such argument can be imagined. For that matter, any "normal, healthy" person's reaction can be imagined, to that employerly solicitude for "freedom" that keeps wages conveniently low. No inducement is unduly high from the point of view of the person being induced.