Attention and creativity.

Attention and creativity.
复制标题

注意力和创造力。

DOI:
10.1017/9781316556238.010
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Darya L. Zabelina
Darya L. Zabelina
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Darya L. Zabelina

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

创造力可以被定义为创作出新颖且有意义或有用的作品的能力,而不是琐碎或奇异的作品。人们的创造力不同,衡量创造力的方法也多种多样。评估创造性思维最常用的措施之一是发散思维(DT)测试,它通过在有限的时间内和在实验室环境中探索给定问题的许多可能的原始解决方案来评估产生想法的能力。大量文献表明,有创造力的人注意力分散或泄漏。也就是说,有创造力的人倾向于注意到与手头的任务不太相关的信息。另一方面,一些人认为,富有创造力的人更有可能关注细粒度的细节,因此比缺乏创造力的人更能集中注意力。最后,有证据表明,富有创造力的人的主要注意力模式不一定有所不同,但可以更轻松地在各种注意力模式之间切换,因此具有灵活的注意力。在这里,我回顾了每种观点的证据,并建议这些观点不必相互竞争。相反,它们可能都在运作,但在不同类型或不同的创造力测量上,在工作中具有不同的关注因素。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)
Creativity can be defined as the ability to produce work that is simultaneously novel and meaningful or useful, as opposed to trivial or bizarre. People differ in the capacity to be creative, and there are various ways of measuring creative ability. One of the most commonly used measures to evaluate creative thinking is a test of divergent thinking (DT), which assesses the ability to generate ideas by exploring many possible original solutions to a given problem, within a limited amount of time, and in laboratory settings. A large body of literature suggests that creative people have diffused or leaky attention; that is, creative people show the propensity to notice information that may not be particularly relevant to the task at hand. On the other hand, some have suggested that creative people are more likely to pay attention to the fine-grained details, and thus have more focused attention than less creative people. Finally, evidence exists that creative people do not necessarily differ in their predominant mode of attention, but can switch between various modes of attention more easily, and therefore have flexible attention. Here I review evidence for each view, and suggest that these views need not compete. Rather, they may all operate, but on different types or measures of creativity, with different factors of attention at work.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624
发表时间: 2001-06
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
M. Botvinick;T. Braver;D. Barch;C. Carter;J. Cohen
通讯作者: M. Botvinick;T. Braver;D. Barch;C. Carter;J. Cohen
维度精神病理学测量与创造性成就或发散性思维有关吗?
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01029
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Zabelina,DaryaL;Condon,David;Beeman,Mark
通讯作者: Beeman,Mark