An Empirical Test of the Agglutination Hypothesis
An Empirical Test of the Agglutination Hypothesis
复制标题
凝集假说的实证检验
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Martin Haspelmath
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin Haspelmath
在本文中，我从经验的角度将凝集融合的区别在于。尽管众所周知的语言形态学类型（隔离，凝聚，弯曲/融合，融合）经常被批评为空的，但实际上（主要是）凝聚的旧观念和（主要是）融合语言实际上做出了两个隐含的预测。首先，凝集/融合是整种语言而不是单个结构的特征。其次，凝集/融合的各种组成部分彼此相关。因此，（未说过但被广泛假设的）凝集假设可以表达如下：
In this paper, I approach the agglutination-fusion distinction from an empirical point of view. Although the well-known morphological typology of languages (isolating, agglutinating, flexive/fusional, incorporating) has often been criticized as empty, the old idea that there are (predominantly) agglutinating and (predominantly) fusional languages in fact makes two implicit predictions. First, agglutination/fusion is characteristic of whole languages rather than individual constructions; second, the various components of agglutination/fusion correlate with each other. The (unstated, but widely assumed) Agglutination Hypothesis can thus be formulated as follows: