Mobile applications in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mobile applications in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0265927
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Thunga G
Thunga G
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chandran VP;Balakrishnan A;Rashid M;Pai Kulyadi G;Khan S;Devi ES;Nair S;Thunga G

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本综述评估了智能手机应用程序在提高医疗保健专业人员和学生的学习成绩和临床实践方面的有效性。本研究遵循系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。通过综合检索策略从PubMed、Scopus和科克伦图书馆检索文献。研究包括医学,牙科,护理,专职医疗保健专业人员,本科生,研究生和实习生从相同的学科谁使用移动的应用程序的学术学习和/或日常临床实践被认为是。52项研究,共4057名学习者参与了这项审查。33项研究(15项RCT、1项群集RCT、7项准实验研究、9项干预性队列研究和1项横断面研究)报告称,移动的应用程序是一种有效工具,有助于显著提高参与者的知识水平。15项研究(962名参与者)的汇总效应显示,与未使用移动的应用程序的组相比,使用移动的应用程序的组的知识得分显著提高(SMD = 0.94,95% CI = 0.57至1.31,P<0.00001)。19项研究(11项随机对照试验、3项准实验性研究和5项干预性队列研究)报告称,移动的应用程序可有效显著提高参与者的技能。移动的应用程序是提高知识和技能的有效工具。考虑到它们的低成本,高通用性,减少对区域或站点边界的依赖,在线和离线,模拟以及移动的应用程序的灵活学习功能,它们可以被视为医学教育中的有效辅助工具。
This review evaluates the effectiveness of smartphone applications in improving academic performance and clinical practice among healthcare professionals and students. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library through a comprehensive search strategy. Studies that included medical, dental, nursing, allied healthcare professional, undergraduates, postgraduates, and interns from the same disciplines who used mobile applications for their academic learning and/or daily clinical practice were considered. 52 studies with a total of 4057 learner participants were included in this review. 33 studies (15 RCTs, 1 cluster RCT, 7 quasi-experimental studies, 9 interventional cohort studies and 1 cross-sectional study) reported that mobile applications were an effective tool that contributed to a significant improvement in the knowledge level of the participants. The pooled effect of 15 studies with 962 participants showed that the knowledge score improved significantly in the group using mobile applications when compared to the group who did not use mobile applications (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.57 to1.31, P<0.00001). 19 studies (11 RCTs, 3 quasi-experimental studies and 5 interventional cohort studies) reported that mobile applications were effective in significantly improving skills among the participants. Mobile applications are effective tools in enhancing knowledge and skills. They can be considered as effective adjunct tools in medical education by considering their low expense, high versatility, reduced dependency on regional or site boundaries, online and offline, simulation, and flexible learning features of mobile apps.
DOI: 10.4103/1357-6283.210514
发表时间: 2017-01-01
影响因子: 0.7
作者:
Deshpande, Saee;Chahande, Jaishree;Rathi, Akhil
通讯作者: Rathi, Akhil
DOI: 10.2196/12825
发表时间: 2019-04-09
影响因子: 5
作者:
Clavier, Thomas;Ramen, Julie;Compere, Vincent
通讯作者: Compere, Vincent
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.2.672
发表时间: 2019-03-01
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Hisam, Aliya;Shafique, Muhammad Umair;Shakeel, Talha
通讯作者: Shakeel, Talha
与教科书学习对医学生相比,移动增强现实学习的影响:随机对照试验研究。
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2497
发表时间: 2013-08-20
影响因子: 7.4
作者:
Albrecht UV;Folta-Schoofs K;Behrends M;von Jan U
通讯作者: von Jan U
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9956
发表时间: 2018-05-01
影响因子: 7.4
作者:
Haubruck, Patrick;Nickel, Felix;Tanner, Michael C.
通讯作者: Tanner, Michael C.