Pregnant nurses’ experiences of working shifts: a qualitative systematic review protocol
Pregnant nurses’ experiences of working shifts: a qualitative systematic review protocol
复制标题
怀孕护士轮班经历：定性系统评价方案
DOI：
10.11124/jbies-22-00060
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Ueki Shingo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ooshige Narumi;Matsunaka Eriko;Ueki Shingo
目的：本系统评价的目的是综合经验的护士谁的工作在pregnancy.Introduction：怀孕是一个过程中的快速物理变化，需要适应精神和身体。许多妇女在怀孕期间继续工作，包括在护理行业，但有各种风险与怀孕期间工作相关。纳入标准：本次审查包括的研究集中在怀孕的注册护士的经验，无论他们的资格水平，在任何工作场所，包括医院，疗养院设施，或诊所，在任何国家的轮班工作。护士不参与直接护理（如，先进的实践护士，管理人员，教育工作者）excluded.Methods：审查遵循JBI方法的定性系统评价。通过CINAHL（EBSCOhost）、MEDLINE（EBSCOhost）、PsycINFO（EBSCOhost）和Igaku Chuo Zasshi（Japan Medical Abstracts Society）检索已发表和灰色文献。没有语言限制，日期限制为2013年至2021年。两名独立的审查员进行数据收集、提取、批判性评价和分析。明确和可信的结果被用来开发类别，然后合成，以提供一套全面的调查结果，根据ConQual.Results分级：五个定性研究（2个来自美国，2个来自日本，1个来自韩国），其中23个结果与叙事插图被提取。在这些调查结果中，22项被评估为明确，1项被评估为可信。根据JBI定性研究的关键评估清单，这些研究的质量为低至中等。所有研究均采用质性研究方法，包括现象学、质性描述和扎根理论方法。结果被整合为8个类别和3个综合结果。第一个综合的发现是，护士与怀孕的身体负担和工作环境，威胁继续怀孕的斗争。第二是护士通过披露自己怀孕并获得支持来实现工作与怀孕的兼容性。第三个是，作为一个护士的发展结果在怀孕期间继续工作。结论：怀孕的护士面临着一个严酷的工作环境，他们透露自己怀孕后得到的支持，使他们能够平衡工作和怀孕，他们觉得他们成长为专业人士，继续工作，即使他们怀孕了。需要更多的研究来告知怀孕护士的支持系统。评论注册：PROSPERO CRD 42022309674补充数字内容：本评论摘要的日语版本可在：https：//links. lww。com/SRX/A31
Objective:The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the experiences of nurses who work shifts during pregnancy.Introduction:Pregnancy is a process of rapid physical change that requires adaptation both mentally and physically. Many women continue to work during pregnancy, including in the nursing profession, but there are various risks associated with working while pregnant.Inclusion criteria:This review included studies that focused on the experiences of pregnant registered nurses, regardless of their level of qualification, working shifts in any workplace, including hospitals, nursing home facilities, or clinics, in any country. Nurses not involved in direct care (eg, advanced practice nurses, administrators, educators) were excluded.Methods:The review followed the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched for via CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). No language restrictions were imposed, and the date limit was set for 2013 to 2021. Two independent reviewers performed data collection, extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis. Unequivocal and credible findings were used to develop categories, which were then synthesized to provide a set of comprehensive findings that were graded according to ConQual.Results:Five qualitative studies were included (2 from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Korea), from which 23 findings with narrative illustrations were extracted. Of these findings, 22 were assessed as unequivocal and 1 as credible. The studies were low to moderate quality based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. All studies used qualitative methodologies, including phenomenology, qualitative description, and the grounded theory approach. Results were integrated into 8 categories and 3 synthesized findings. The first synthesized finding was that nurses struggle with the physical burden of pregnancy and work environments that threaten continued pregnancy. The second was that nurses achieve work–pregnancy compatibility by disclosing their pregnancy and obtaining support. The third was that development as a nurse results from continuing to work during pregnancy.Conclusions:Pregnant nurses face a harsh work environment; the support they receive after disclosing their pregnancy allows them to balance work and pregnancy; and they feel that they grow as professionals by continuing to work even if they are pregnant. More research is needed to inform support systems for pregnant nurses.Review registration:PROSPERO CRD42022309674Supplemental digital content:A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available: https://links. lww. com/SRX/A31