Reporting and Interpreting Scores Derived from Likert-Type Scales.
Reporting and Interpreting Scores Derived from Likert-Type Scales.
复制标题
报告和解释从李克特型量表得出的分数。
DOI：
10.5032/jae.2014.05030
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. R. Warmbrod
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. R. Warmbrod
在1995年至2012年发表在《农业教育杂志》上的706篇文章中，有49%的文章报告了至少有一个变量通过李克特量表测量的定量研究。基于经典测试理论的信度定义和Likertscale测量方法的基本原则，对于使用Likertscale方法的344篇文章的目标人群，研究的目的是（a）描述来自Likerttype量表报告和解释的分数，（B）描述解释分数引用的信度系数，以及（c）确定所引用的信度系数与报告和解释的Likert量表得分之间是否存在一致或不一致。在344篇文章中，28%的文章表现出对Likert量表评分的一致解释，45%的文章表现出不一致解释，27%的文章表现出一致和不一致解释。在63%的文章中报告和解释了单项评分，其中98%是不一致的解释。在59%的文章中报告和解释了总分，其中91%是一致的解释。建议的分析，解释和报告的分数来自李克特型量表。
Forty-nine percent of the 706 articles published in the Journal of Agricultural Education from 1995 to 2012 reported quantitative research with at least one variable measured by a Likert-type scale. Grounded in the classical test theory definition of reliability and the tenets basic to Likertscale measurement methodology, for the target population of 344 articles using Likert-scale methodology, the objectives of the research were to (a) describe the scores derived from Likerttype scales reported and interpreted, (b) describe the reliability coefficients cited for the scores interpreted, and (c) ascertain whether there is congruence or incongruence between the reliability coefficient cited and the Likert-scale scores reported and interpreted. Twenty-eight percent of the 344 articles exhibited congruent interpretations of Likert-scale scores, 45% of the articles exhibited incongruent interpretations, and 27% of the articles exhibited both congruent and incongruent interpretations. Single-item scores were reported and interpreted in 63% of the articles, 98% of which were incongruent interpretations. Summated scores were reported and interpreted in 59% of the articles, 91% of which were congruent interpretations. Recommendations for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of scores derived from Likert-type scales are presented.