Quality criteria for multi-domain studies in the indoor environment: Critical review towards research guidelines and recommendations-猫眼课题宝

DOI：

10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109719

发表时间：

2022-10

期刊：

Building and Environment

影响因子：

7.4

通讯作者：

中科院分区：

工程技术1区

文献类型：

作者：

G. Chinazzo;R. Andersen;Elie Azar;V. Barthelmes;C. Becchio;L. Belussi;C. Berger;S. Carlucci;S. Corgnati;Sarah Crosby;L. Danza;Luiza de Castro;Matteo Favero;S. Gauthier;R. Hellwig;Quan Jin;Joyce Kim;M. S. Khanie;D. Khovalyg;Carola Lingua;A. Luna-Navarro;A. Mahdavi;Clayton Miller;Isabel Mino-Rodriguez;I. Pigliautile;A. Pisello;R. F. Rupp;Abdul-Manan Sadick;F. Salamone;M. Schweiker;Marc Syndicus;G. Spigliantini;N. G. Vasquez;Donna Vakalis;M. Vellei;Shen Wei

建筑物居住者的感知、生理、行为和表现受到多域暴露的影响：多个环境刺激的同时存在，即，视觉、热、声和空气质量。尽管广泛，多领域暴露的文献呈现出不同的方法学方法和不一致的研究报告，这阻碍了研究和荟萃分析之间的直接比较。因此，除了开展更多的多领域研究外，还需要以系统和透明的方式设计、开展和记录此类调查。为了促进和支持未来的多领域研究及其荟萃分析，这项工作提供了（1）多领域研究设计和报告的一系列标准（即，定义为质量标准），以及（2）基于所描述的标准对多领域文献进行批判性审查，这可以作为该主题未来研究的指南和建议。确定的质量标准包括研究设置、研究部署和分析以及研究结果，强调采用一致的术语和结果报告风格的重要性。开发的关键审查突出了几个缺点，在设计，部署和文档的多领域的研究，强调需要提高质量的未来多领域的研究。这项工作的最终目标是巩固我们对多领域风险的了解，以便将其整合到监管资源和指南中，这些资源和指南目前主要由单领域知识主导。

The perception, physiology, behavior, and performance of building occupants are influenced by multi-domain exposures: the simultaneous presence of multiple environmental stimuli, i.e., visual, thermal, acoustic, and air quality. Despite being extensive, the literature on multi-domain exposures presents heterogeneous methodological approaches and inconsistent study reporting, which hinder direct comparison between studies and meta-analyses. Therefore, in addition to carrying out more multi-domain studies, such investigations need to be designed, conducted, and documented in a systematic and transparent way. With the goal to facilitate and support future multi-domain studies and their meta-analyses, this work provides (1) a range of criteria for multi-domain study design and reporting (i.e., defined as quality criteria), and (2) a critical review of the multi-domain literature based on the described criteria, which can serve as guidelines and recommendations for future studies on the topic. The identified quality criteria encompass study set-up, study deployment and analysis, and study outcome, stressing the importance of adopting a consistent terminology and result reporting style. The developed critical review highlights several shortcomings in the design, deployment, and documentation of multi-domain studies, emphasizing the need for quality improvements of future multi-domain research. The ultimate goal of this work is to consolidate our knowledge on multi-domain exposures for its integration into regulatory resources and guidelines, which are currently dominated by single-domain knowledge.

Quality criteria for multi-domain studies in the indoor environment: Critical review towards research guidelines and recommendations

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献