Intermittent clamping is more effective than ischemic preconditioning and its effect is more marked with shorter cycle of intermittent clamping in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Intermittent clamping is more effective than ischemic preconditioning and its effect is more marked with shorter cycle of intermittent clamping in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion injury.
复制标题

在大鼠缺血/再灌注损伤模型中,间歇钳夹比缺血预处理更有效,且间歇钳夹周期越短,其效果越显着。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Makuuchi M.
Makuuchi M.
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Imamura H;Seyama Y;Inagaki Y;Tang W;Kokudo N;Makuuchi M.

文献摘要

相似文献