Pre-induction of labour: comparing dinoprostone vaginal insert to repeated prostaglandin administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pre-induction of labour: comparing dinoprostone vaginal insert to repeated prostaglandin administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.3109/14767058.2012.668584
复制
发表时间:
2012-10-01
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Del Giovane, Cinzia
Del Giovane, Cinzia
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Facchinetti, Fabio;Fontanesi, Francesca;Del Giovane, Cinzia

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:评估地诺前列酮阴道植入物与重复给予前列腺素(包括地诺前列酮和米索前列醇)相比在足月女性中的疗效和安全性。方法:通过电子数据库和手工检索,确定随机对照试验(RCT)。我们纳入的研究分别报告了子宫颈不利的妇女中未经产和/或经产的数据(Bishop
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to repeated prostaglandin administration (including dinoprostone and misoprostol) in women at term. Methods: Electronic databases and additional handsearching were used to identify randomized controlled trial (RCT). We included studies reporting data separately for nulliparous and/or multiparous in women with unfavourable cervix (Bishop