Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.
Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/aud.0b013e3181ce6355
复制
发表时间:
2010-06
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Leach-Berth T
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Martin BA;Boothroyd A;Ali D;Leach-Berth T
The purpose was to compare four strategies for stimulus presentation in terms of their efficiency when generating a speech-evoked cortical acoustic change complex (ACC) in adults and children. interrupted presentation of a one-second stimulus containing a single change from /u/ to /i/ using a two-second inter-onset interval. interrupted presentation of the same stimulus using a one-second inter-onset interval. interrupted presentation of a 1.5-second stimulus containing a change from /u/ to /i/ followed by a reverse change from /i/ to /u/, using a two-second inter-onset interval. continuous presentation of a stimulus alternating between /u/ and /i/ using a one-second repetition interval. Ten normally hearing adults (ages 22 to 31 years) and nine normally hearing children (ages six to nine years) served as participants. The ACC was elicited using a 75 dB SPL synthetic vowel containing 1000 Hz changes of second formant frequency, creating a change of perceived vowel between /u/ and /i/. The ACC was recorded from Cz using four stimulus formats: ACC magnitude was expressed as the standard devation of the voltage waveform within a window believed to span the ACC. Noise magnitude was estimated from the variances at each sampling point in the same window. Efficiency was expressed in terms of the ACC-to-noise magnitude ratio divided by testing time. ACC magnitude was not significantly different for the two directions of second formant change. Reducing inter-onset interval from two seconds to one second increased efficiency by a factor close to two. Combining data from the two directions of change increased efficiency further, by a factor approximating the square root of two. Continuous alternating stimulus presentation is more efficient than interrupted stimulus presentation in eliciting the ACC. The benefits of eliminating silent periods and doubling the number of acoustic changes presented in a given time period, are not seriously offset by a reduction in rms response amplitude, at least in young adults and in children as young as 6 years old.