Serial order depends on item-dependent and item-independent contexts.

Serial order depends on item-dependent and item-independent contexts.
复制标题

序列顺序取决于项目相关和项目无关的上下文。

DOI:
10.1037/rev0000422
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Cox, Gregory E.
Cox, Gregory E.
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Logan, Gordon D.;Cox, Gregory E.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们解决了四个问题,以回应Osth和Hurlstone(2022)对序列顺序的上下文检索和更新(CRU)理论(Logan,2021)的评论。首先,我们澄清CRU、链和关联之间的关系。我们表明,CRU是不等同于一个链接理论,并使用相似性,而不是关联检索上下文。其次,我们修正了Logan(2021)在回忆ABCDEF时回忆ACB而不是ACD的倾向(分别为填充错误和填充错误)。当正确实施时,受试者在一阶错误之后将当前上下文与初始列表线索混合的想法正确地预测了填充错误比填充错误更频繁。第三,我们解决特定位置的先验列表入侵,建议修改CRU,并引入一个位置编码模型的基础上CRU表示来解释它们。我们认为,特定于位置的优先列表入侵是某些试验中位置编码的证据,但不是其他试验中项目编码的证据。最后,我们在结构化列表中解决特定位置的组间入侵,同意Osth和Hurlstone的合理修改CRU不能解释它们。我们建议,这种入侵支持位置编码的一些比例的审判,但不排除CRU类项目为基础的代码。我们的结论是,项目独立和项目相关的编码是替代策略,连续回忆,我们强调的重要性,占即时性能。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024阿帕,保留所有权利)
We address four issues in response to Osth and Hurlstone’s (2022) commentary on the context retrieval and updating (CRU) theory of serial order (Logan, 2021). First, we clarify the relations between CRU, chains, and associations. We show that CRU is not equivalent to a chaining theory and uses similarity rather than association to retrieve contexts. Second, we fix an error Logan (2021) made in accounting for the tendency to recall ACB instead of ACD in recalling ABCDEF (fill-in vs. in-fill errors, respectively). When implemented correctly, the idea that subjects mix the current context with an initial list cue after the first order error correctly predicts that fill-in errors are more frequent than in-fill errors. Third, we address position-specific prior-list intrusions, suggesting modifications to CRU and introducing a position-coding model based on CRU representations to account for them. We suggest that position-specific prior-list intrusions are evidence for position coding on some proportion of the trials but are not evidence against item coding on other trials. Finally, we address position-specific between-group intrusions in structured lists, agreeing with Osth and Hurlstone that reasonable modifications to CRU cannot account for them. We suggest that such intrusions support position coding on some proportion of the trials but do not rule out CRU-like item-based codes. We conclude by suggesting that item-independent and item-dependent coding are alternative strategies for serial recall and we stress the importance of accounting for immediate performance.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)