Development of the Test of Nonverbal Cue Knowledge-II (TONCK-II).

Development of the Test of Nonverbal Cue Knowledge-II (TONCK-II).
复制标题

非语言提示知识测试 II (TONCK-II) 的开发。

DOI:
10.1007/s10919-022-00414-5
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
J.A.
J.A.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ogawa;K. & Hall;J.A.

文献摘要

相似文献

开发了非语言线索知识测试(TONCK; Rosip和Hall in J Nonverbal Behav 28(4):267-286,2004)来测量非语言线索意义和用法的外显知识。本研究的目的是开发TONCK-II,这是TONCK的缩短版本,以解决TONCK的弱点并方便使用。在研究1中,我们部分修订了TONCK量表的项目,以增加其适当性,并减少基于区分参数和难度参数的项目数量。通过研究1、2和3,TONCK-II的可靠性从ω系数得到证实。参与者准确解码他人非语言线索的动机以及他们对准确解码这些线索的能力的自我评估之间的相关性不显着或相关性很弱。此外,TONCK-II在研究3中仅与认知智力呈弱正相关。也就是说,TONCK-II的判别效度得到了支持。在研究2中,通过与GEMOK特征(Schlegel和谢勒in Cognut 32(8):1514-1530,2018)的显著正相关性以及与研究3中原始TONCK的关系,证明了收敛效度。在人口统计学变量方面,女性TONCK-II得分显著高于男性,尤其是在年轻一代,但其他人口统计学变量与TONCK-II没有很强的相关性。最后,根据研究结果,对TONCK-Ⅱ的特点和未来的研究方向以及非言语交际知识的研究问题进行了讨论。
The Test of Nonverbal Cue Knowledge (TONCK; Rosip and Hall in J Nonverbal Behav 28(4): 267–286, 2004) was developed to measure explicit knowledge of nonverbal cue meanings and usages. The objective of this research was to develop the TONCK-II, which is a shortened version of the TONCK to address the weaknesses of TONCK and to facilitate use. In Study 1, we partially revised the items of the TONCK scale to increase its appropriateness and reduce the number of items based on discrimination parameters and difficulty parameters. Through Study 1, 2, and 3, the reliabilities of TONCK-II were confirmed from the ω coefficient. The correlations with participants’ motivation to accurately decode others’ nonverbal cues as well as their self-assessment of ability to accurately decode such cues were not significant or correlated only weakly. Moreover, TONCK-II showed only a weak positive correlation with cognitive intelligence in Study 3. That is, the discriminant validity of TONCK-II was supported. Convergent validity was demonstrated in Study 2 by a significant positive correlation with GEMOK-Features (Schlegel and Scherer in Cogn Emot 32(8): 1514–1530, 2018), a test that measures accurate semantic knowledge about the experience and expression of emotions, and by the relation to the original TONCK in Study 3. In relation to demographic variables, women had significantly higher TONCK-II scores than men, especially in the younger generation, but other demographic variables showed no strong correlation with TONCK-II. Finally, based on the results, the characteristics and future directions regarding TONCK-II and research issues of knowledge about nonverbal communication were discussed.