THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW
复制标题
DOI：
10.1001/jama.272.2.143
复制
发表时间：
1994-07-13
影响因子：
120.7
通讯作者：
STRAUSS, B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FISHER, M;FRIEDMAN, SB;STRAUSS, B
客观。-研究是否审稿人知道作者身份偏向于作者与更多以前的出版物。随机对照试验。设置。-《发育与行为儿科学杂志》编辑部。两个“盲”和两个“非盲”的审查员被分配到57个连续的手稿之间提交1991年9月和1992年3月。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数比较两名设盲评审员、两名非设盲评审员和编辑给出的1 - 5分（1，接受; 5，拒绝）评分总和与第一作者和资深作者先前发表的文章数量（根据要求的简历确定）。盲态评审员收到一份问卷，询问他们是否可以确定作者的身份，他们是如何知道的，以及他们是否认为盲态改变了他们的评审质量或难度。Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示设盲和非设盲评分之间无差异。资深作者发表的文章数与其发表的文章数呈显著相关（P
Objective.-To study whether reviewers aware of author identity are biased in favor of authors with more previous publications.Design.-Randomized controlled trial.Setting.-Editorial office of the Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics.Participants.-Two ''blinded'' and two ''nonblinded'' reviewers assigned to 57 consecutive manuscripts submitted between September 1991 and March 1992.Outcome Measures.-Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to compare the sum of rating scores of 1 to 5 (1, accept; 5, reject) given by the two blinded reviewers, the two nonblinded reviewers, and the editors to the number of articles published previously by the first and senior authors (as determined from requested curricula vitae). Blinded reviewers were sent a questionnaire asking whether they could determine the identity of the authors, how they knew, and whether they thought blinding changed the quality or difficulty of their review.Results.-The Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test disclosed no differences between blinded and nonblinded scores. The number of previous articles by the senior author was significantly correlated (P