Radical Mediation

Radical Mediation
复制标题

激进调解

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Richard A. Grusin
Richard A. Grusin
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Richard A. Grusin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

关于调解调解问题已经成为二十世纪末和二十一世纪的核心知识问题之一,部分原因是技术的异常加速,数字媒体技术的猖獗扩散,有时被冠以“媒介化”的名义。1尽管过去几十年激烈的媒介化推动了关于媒体的广泛理论化,但约翰·吉洛里认为,“在文化研究中,调解的概念仍然缺乏理论性,只是微弱地融入到媒体研究中。”2萨拉·肯伯和乔安娜·季林斯卡类似地将调解视为底层媒体。
On Mediation The question of mediation has become one of the central intellectual problems in the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries, in part because of the extraordinary acceleration of technology, the rampant proliferation of digital media technologies that sometimes goes under the name of “mediatization.”1 Despite widespread theorizing about media prompted by the intense mediatization of the past several decades, John Guillory has contended “that the concept of mediation remains undertheorized in the study of culture and only tenuously integrated into the study of media.”2 Sarah Kember and Joanna Zylinska similarly “see mediation as the under-