Clinical questions and "real" research.

Clinical questions and "real" research.
复制标题

临床问题和“真实”研究。

DOI:
10.1176/ajp.138.12.1592
复制
发表时间:
1981
期刊:
The American journal of psychiatry
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hafez,H
Hafez,H
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Strauss,JS;Hafez,H

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

临床经验及其产生的问题是增进对精神病理学及其治疗的理解的丰富潜在来源。然而,临床观察与“真实”研究之间经常存在着鸿沟,而“真实”研究对于开发和测试其意义至关重要。该报告表明,仅限于大样本精细研究的实际研究概念对于该领域的最佳进展来说过于狭窄。描述了在临床背景下系统地发展临床直觉的研究原则。指出了此类研究的重要价值和局限性。
Clinical experiences and the questions they generate are a rich potential source for increased understanding of psychopathology and its treatment. Yet a chasm frequently appears to exist isolating clinical observations from the" real" research viewed as essential to developing and testing their implications. This report suggests that a concept of real research limited to large-sample elaborate studies is too narrow for optimal progress in the field. Research principles for developing a clinical intuition systematically, in the clinical context, are described. The important values as well as limitations of this kind of research are noted.