Pediatric quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q): Reliability and validity

Pediatric quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q): Reliability and validity
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/01.chi.0000198590.38325.81
复制
发表时间:
2006-04-01
影响因子:
13.3
通讯作者:
Wohlberg, C
Wohlberg, C
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Endicott, J;Nee, J;Wohlberg, C

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:儿童版的生活质量享受和满意度问卷(PQ-LES-Q)的发展,以帮助在儿童和青少年的生活经验的一个重要方面的评估。方法:使用376名门诊儿童(6-11岁)和青少年(12-17岁)重性抑郁障碍患者的数据对PQ-LES-Q的信度和效度进行了检验。结果如下:筛选、基线和终点的内部一致性系数较高(分别为0.87、0.90、0.89),1周重测组内相关系数的可靠性也较高(0.78)。PQ-LES-Q总分与疾病严重程度的同时测量值的相关性在中等范围内(例如,严重程度的总体临床印象,-0.40;儿童总体评估量表,0.36;儿童抑郁评定量表总分,-0.45),以及基线和终点之间变化测量的相关性(例如,严重程度临床总体印象,-0.34;儿童总体评估量表,0.33;儿童抑郁评定量表总分,-0.45)。结论:这些发现支持使用PQ-LES-Q作为当前临床状态和结局的额外指标,因为它利用了常用的全球疾病严重程度或症状指标未涵盖的维度。
Objective: The pediatric version of the Short Form of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q) was developed to aid in the assessment of an important aspect of life experience in children and adolescents. Method: The reliability and validity of the PQ-LES-Q was tested using data from a sample of 376 outpatient children (6-11 years old) and adolescents (12-17 years old) with major depressive disorder. Results: The internal consistency coefficients at screening, baseline, and endpoint were high (0.87, 0.90, 0.89, respectively) as was the 1-week test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient of reliability (0.78). The correlations of the PQ-LES-Q total score with concurrent measures of severity of illness were in the moderate range (e.g., Global Clinical Impression of Severity, -0.40; Children's Global Assessment Scale, 0.36; Children's Depression Rating Scale total score, -0.45), as were the correlations with measures of change between baseline and endpoint (e.g., Clinical Global Impression of Severity, -0.34; Children's Global Assessment Scale, 0.33; Children's Depression Rating Scale total score, -0.45). Conclusions: These findings support the use of the PQ-LES-Q as an additional measure of current clinical status and outcome because it taps dimensions that are not covered by the commonly used global severity of illness or symptomatic measures.