Criphystemologies: What Disability Theory Needs to Know about Hysteria
Criphystemologies: What Disability Theory Needs to Know about Hysteria
复制标题
Criphystemologies：残疾理论需要了解什么关于癔症
DOI：
10.3828/jlcds.2014.15
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Mollow
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Mollow
通过阅读弗洛伊德的病例史《朵拉》，文章认为，“歇斯底里”的文化建构是压迫那些可能被称为“无证残疾”的人的一个关键因素——即那些既不可见也不能被现代西方医学技术明确测量的缺陷。争论的焦点是，残疾研究中流行的理论范式在发展对未记录在案的残疾的批判性分析方面用途有限。只要残疾的社会模式（以及相关的“对医学模式的批判”）淡化残疾与痛苦之间的联系，它可能会加强对无证残疾主体的压迫。这些被试通常被标记为“歇斯底里”，他们必须努力让自己认识到所经历的致残痛苦。本文引入术语密码系统来引用认识论，验证无证残疾人的生活经验。
Through a reading of Freud’s case history Dora, the article argues that the cultural construction of “hysteria” is a crucial factor in the oppression of people with what may be termed “undocumented disabilities”—that is, impairments that are neither visible nor definitively measurable by modern Western medical technologies. The contention is that the prevailing theoretical paradigms in disability studies are of limited use in developing critical analyses of undocumented disability. Insofar as the social model of disability (and the related “critique of the medical model”) downplays connections between disability and suffering, it may reinforce the oppression of subjects with undocumented disabilities. Such subjects, often marked as “hysterical,” must struggle to obtain recognition of the disabling suffering that is experienced. The article introduces the term criphystemologies to reference epistemologies that validate the lived experiences of people with undocumented disabilities.