CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights
CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights
复制标题
国际农业研究磋商小组关于集体行动和财产权的全系统计划
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Esther Mwangi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Esther Mwangi
流域工程在世界范围内的水土资源管理中发挥着越来越重要的作用。需要进行研究，以确保新的项目吸取前人的经验教训。然而，流域工程的技术和社会复杂性给评价带来了困难。传统上分开使用的定量和定性评价方法各有长处和短处。将它们结合起来可以使评估更有效，特别是在研究设计存在限制的情况下。本文提出了流域项目评价的混合方法。印度最近的一项评估提供了例证。
Watershed projects play an increasingly important role in managing soil and water resources throughout the world. Research is needed to ensure that new projects draw upon lessons from their predecessors’ experiences. However, the technical and social complexities of watershed projects make evaluation difficult. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods, which traditionally have been used separately, both have strengths and weaknesses. Combining them can make evaluation more effective, particularly when constraints to study design exist. This paper presents mixed-methods approaches for evaluating watershed projects. A recent evaluation in India provides illustrations.