Are we ABL to do better for children with BCR-ABL1-like acute lymphocytic leukaemia?
Are we ABL to do better for children with BCR-ABL1-like acute lymphocytic leukaemia?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s2352-3026(20)30362-8
复制
发表时间:
2021-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tasian SK
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tasian SK
Just one decade ago, two paediatric leukaemia-focused research teams independently identified what is now known as BCR–ABL1-like (also known as Philadelphia chromosome-like) acute lymphocytic leukaemia among children with high-risk, cytogenetically normal B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia, who showed a very high risk of relapse with conventional chemotherapy. 1, 2 The leukaemic cells of these patients were found to harbour a kinase-activated gene expression profile similar to that of BCR–ABL1 fusion-positive acute lymphocytic leukaemia, yet they were negative for the sentinel BCR–ABL1 rearrangement. Over the past 10 years, detailed molecular characterisation of BCR–ABL1-like acute lymphocytic leukaemia via national and international collaborative efforts has revealed the remarkable genetic heterogeneity and characteristic constitutive kinase signalling pathways of this disease type3 and has elucidated its incidence across the paediatric-to-adult age spectrum. Numerous preclinical studies have further indicated that BCR–ABL1-like acute lymphocytic leukaemia cells show sensitivity to targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in vitro and in vivo, which has led to current earlyphase clinical trials assessing the safety and potential efficacy of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in addition to chemotherapy in children and adults with relapsed or newly-diagnosed BCR–ABL1-like acute lymphocytic leukaemia. 4 However, well defined clinical outcomes of retrospectively-identified children with BCR-ABL1-like acute lymphocytic leukaemia, who have been treated uniformly with the best available chemotherapy regimens, remain poorly defined. This absence of data has created appreciable challenges for potential efficacy assessment in current single experimental treatment group clinical trial designs, which have been required to date given the relative rarity of BCR–ABL1-like