Urban Citizenship and Right to the City: The Fragmentation of Claims

Urban Citizenship and Right to the City: The Fragmentation of Claims
复制标题

城市公民权和城市​​权:权利要求的碎片化

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Talia Margalit
Talia Margalit
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Blokland;C. Hentschel;Andrej Holm;Henrik Lebuhn;Talia Margalit

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

type=“main”>在这次研讨会中,我们探讨了城市公民身份如何表达,如果不是生产,差异,以及主张的碎片化如何影响城市公民身份和城市运动的权利,以及他们的普遍性,包容性的理想。通过对特拉维夫和柏林公共空间中的社会运动、政治参与和冲突的分析,我们看到了一种利益多元化的趋势,运动的弱化,甚至是对权利和资源的竞争,而不是在通往宜居城市的道路上发展各种群体之间的相互支持和团结。我们认为,这种紧张关系值得关注。激进的城市学术和政治需要更好地理解历史和特定地点的背景,这些背景构成了公民权利主张的形成和公民权利斗争的过程。因此,城市公民身份作为一个更有背景、更面向社区和自下而上的框架(与国家公民身份相比)的庆祝活动,应该辅之以对其支离破碎的做法的仔细调查。
type="main"> In this symposium, we explore how urban citizenship is about expressing, if not producing, difference, and how fragmentation of claims affects urban citizenship and right to the city movements with their universal, all-inclusive ideals. Investigating social movements, political participation and conflicting diversities in public space in Tel Aviv and Berlin, we see a trend towards a diversification of interests, a weakening of movements, and even a competition over rights and resources rather than a development of mutual support and solidarities among various groups on the pathway to a livable city. This tension, we argue, deserves attention. Radical urban scholarship and politics need to better understand the historical and place-specific contexts that structure the formation of citizenship claims and the courses that citizenship struggles take. Celebrations of urban citizenship as a more contextualized, community oriented, and bottom-up framework (in comparison to national citizenship) should therefore be complemented by a careful investigation of their fragmented and fragmenting practices.
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12261
发表时间: 2015
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Kosnick
通讯作者: Kosnick