Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
复制标题
欠匹配：对并发可变间隔强化计划的表现进行重新评估。
DOI：
10.1901/jeab.1977.27-203
复制
发表时间：
1977
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Lawrence E. Myers
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David L. Myers;Lawrence E. Myers
详细研究了鸽子在并行可变间隔时间表上的表现的现存数据。最小二乘法线相关的相对啄食和相应的相对钢筋的时间，获得了四项研究。时间和啄次数的研究组间斜率以及来自个体研究的7个研究组内斜率中的5个小于1.00。这表明鸽子对更丰富的强化时间表的反应比匹配预测的要少。对于啄，点分布的非参数检验也支持这种匹配不足的概念（更丰富的强化时间表）。此外，以均方误差为标准，三次曲线拟合的啄食比例数据比任何直线或其他多项式。这表明配筋率与配筋率的关系可能是非线性的。
The extant data for pigeons' performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules were examined in detail. Least-squares lines relating relative pecks and time to the corresponding relative reinforcements were obtained for four studies. The between-study group slopes for time and pecks and five of seven within-study group slopes from individual studies were less than 1.00. This suggested the generality that pigeons respond less to the richer reinforcement schedule than predicted by matching. For pecks, a nonparametric test for distribution of points also supported this concept of undermatching (to the richer reinforcement schedule). In addition, using mean squared error as the criterion, a cubic curve fit the peck proportion data better than any line or other polynomial. This indicates that the relation between peck and reinforcement proportions may be nonlinear.