Mental disorders and risk of COVID-19-related mortality, hospitalisation, and intensive care unit admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mental disorders and risk of COVID-19-related mortality, hospitalisation, and intensive care unit admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00232-7
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
期刊:
The lancet. Psychiatry
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
De Picker LJ
De Picker LJ
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vai B;Mazza MG;Delli Colli C;Foiselle M;Allen B;Benedetti F;Borsini A;Casanova Dias M;Tamouza R;Leboyer M;Benros ME;Branchi I;Fusar-Poli P;De Picker LJ

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

精神障碍可能是严重 COVID-19 的危险因素。我们的目的是评估与任何先前存在的精神障碍相关的与 COVID-19 相关的死亡率、住院治疗和重症监护病房 (ICU) 入住的具体风险,以及精神障碍的特定诊断类别以及接触精神药理学药物类别的风险。在这项系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们检索了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 5 日期间的 Web of Science、Cochrane、PubMed 和 PsycINFO 数据库,以获取报告精神​​疾病患者与对照患者的 COVID-19 结局数据的原始研究。我们排除了样本重叠的研究、未经同行评审的研究以及以英语、丹麦语、荷兰语、法语、德语、意大利语和葡萄牙语以外的语言撰写的研究。我们对随机效应荟萃分析进行建模,以估计 SARS-CoV-2 感染后死亡率的粗比值比 (OR) 作为主要结局,住院和 ICU 入住作为次要结局。我们计算了可用数据的调整后 OR。使用 I2 统计量评估异质性,并使用 Egger 回归和漏斗图的目视检查测试发表偏倚。我们使用 GRADE 方法来评估证据的整体强度,并使用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表来评估研究质量。我们还进行了亚组分析和荟萃回归,以评估基线 COVID-19 治疗环境、患者年龄、国家/地区、大流行阶段、质量评估评分、样本量和混杂因素调整的影响。本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册,CRD42021233984。系统检索共确定了 841 项研究,其中 33 项研究纳入系统评价,23 项研究纳入荟萃分析,包括 1~469~731 名 COVID-19 患者,其中 43~938 名患有精神障碍。样本包括 130±807 名女性(占整个样本的 8·9%)和 130±373 名男性(8·8%)。 9 项研究提供了有关患者种族和民族的数据,22 项研究被评为高质量。任何精神障碍的存在都与 COVID-19 死亡风险增加相关(OR 2·00 [95% CI 1·58–2·54];I2=92·66%)。精神障碍 (2·05 [1·37–3·06]; I2=80·81%)、情绪障碍 (1·99 [1·46–2·71]; I2=68·32%)、物质使用障碍 (1·76 [1·27–2·44]; I2=47·90%) 以及智力障碍和发育障碍 (1·73) 也观察到这种关联。 [1·29–2·31];I2=90·15%),但不适用于焦虑症(1·07 [0·73–1·56];I2=11·05%)。 COVID-19死亡率与服用抗精神病药(3·71 [1·74–7·91];I2=90·31%)、抗焦虑药(2·58 [1·22–5·44];I2=96·42%)和抗抑郁药(2·23 [1·06–4·71];I2=95·45%)相关。对于精神障碍、情绪障碍、抗精神病药物和抗焦虑药物,在调整年龄、性别和其他混杂因素后,这种关联仍然显着。精神障碍与住院风险增加相关(2·24 [1·70–2·94];I2=88·80%)。没有发现 ICU 入住与死亡率有显着相关性。亚组分析和荟萃回归显示,基线 COVID-19 治疗环境 (p=0·013) 和国家 (p<0·0001) 与死亡率存在显着相关性。其他协变量与死亡率没有显着相关性。没有发现发表偏倚的证据。 GRADE 评估表明,粗死亡率和住院治疗的确定性较高,而粗入 ICU 的确定性中等。在粗略模型和调整后模型中,先前存在的精神障碍,特别是精神病性和情绪障碍,以及接触抗精神病药和抗焦虑药都与 COVID-19 死亡率相关。尽管需要进一步研究来确定潜在机制,但我们的研究结果强调需要有针对性的方法来管理和预防本研究中确定的高危患者群体中的 COVID-19。没有任何。有关摘要的意大利语、法语和葡萄牙语翻译,请参阅补充材料部分。
Mental disorders might be a risk factor for severe COVID-19. We aimed to assess the specific risks of COVID-19-related mortality, hospitalisation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission associated with any pre-existing mental disorder, and specific diagnostic categories of mental disorders, and exposure to psychopharmacological drug classes. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases between Jan 1, 2020, and March 5, 2021, for original studies reporting data on COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psychiatric disorders compared with controls. We excluded studies with overlapping samples, studies that were not peer-reviewed, and studies written in languages other than English, Danish, Dutch, French, German, Italian, and Portuguese. We modelled random-effects meta-analyses to estimate crude odds ratios (OR) for mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection as the primary outcome, and hospitalisation and ICU admission as secondary outcomes. We calculated adjusted ORs for available data. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and publication bias was tested with Egger regression and visual inspection of funnel plots. We used the GRADE approach to assess the overall strength of the evidence and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale to assess study quality. We also did subgroup analyses and meta-regressions to assess the effects of baseline COVID-19 treatment setting, patient age, country, pandemic phase, quality assessment score, sample sizes, and adjustment for confounders. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021233984. 841 studies were identified by the systematic search, of which 33 studies were included in the systematic review and 23 studies in the meta-analysis, comprising 1 469 731 patients with COVID-19, of whom 43 938 had mental disorders. The sample included 130 807 females (8·9% of the whole sample) and 130 373 males (8·8%). Nine studies provided data on patient race and ethnicity, and 22 studies were rated as high quality. The presence of any mental disorder was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 mortality (OR 2·00 [95% CI 1·58–2·54]; I2=92·66%). This association was also observed for psychotic disorders (2·05 [1·37–3·06]; I2=80·81%), mood disorders (1·99 [1·46–2·71]; I2=68·32%), substance use disorders (1·76 [1·27–2·44]; I2=47·90%), and intellectual disabilities and developmental disorders (1·73 [1·29–2·31]; I2=90·15%) but not for anxiety disorders (1·07 [0·73–1·56]; I2=11·05%). COVID-19 mortality was associated with exposure to antipsychotics (3·71 [1·74–7·91]; I2=90·31%), anxiolytics (2·58 [1·22–5·44]; I2=96·42%), and antidepressants (2·23 [1·06–4·71]; I2=95·45%). For psychotic disorders, mood disorders, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics, the association remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, and other confounders. Mental disorders were associated with increased risk of hospitalisation (2·24 [1·70–2·94]; I2=88·80%). No significant associations with mortality were identified for ICU admission. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions showed significant associations of baseline COVID-19 treatment setting (p=0·013) and country (p<0·0001) with mortality. No significant associations with mortality were identified for other covariates. No evidence of publication bias was found. GRADE assessment indicated high certainty for crude mortality and hospitalisation, and moderate certainty for crude ICU admission. Pre-existing mental disorders, in particular psychotic and mood disorders, and exposure to antipsychotics and anxiolytics were associated with COVID-19 mortality in both crude and adjusted models. Although further research is required to determine the underlying mechanisms, our findings highlight the need for targeted approaches to manage and prevent COVID-19 in at-risk patient groups identified in this study. None. For the Italian, French and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.