The importance of context: Three corrections to Cordaro, Keltner, Tshering, Wangchuk, and Flynn (2016).
The importance of context: Three corrections to Cordaro, Keltner, Tshering, Wangchuk, and Flynn (2016).
复制标题
背景的重要性：对 Cordaro、Keltner、Tshering、Wangchuk 和 Flynn (2016) 的三处更正。
DOI：
10.1037/emo0000217
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gendron,Maria
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barrett,LisaFeldman;Gendron,Maria
Cordaro、Keltner、Tshering、Wangchuk 和 Flynn 在他们最近发表的文章《声音在十种全球化文化和不丹一个偏远村庄中传达情感》中得出结论，某些情感类别是世界各地人们普遍认可的，排除疾病和测量误差。与所有实证研究一样，Cordaro 等人的文章的影响力不仅取决于其研究结果，还取决于研究结果的定位。准确描述新发现的科学背景与维持科学方法其他方面的最高标准同样重要。在这方面，我们在 Cordaro 等人对过去远程样本研究的讨论中指出了三个值得关注的领域：过去研究中更多以发现为导向（且验证性较少）的实验方法的使用，以及过去研究中操纵检查的使用。最终，当模糊性和疏忽掩盖了研究结果的真正价值时，研究对科学进步的贡献就会受到限制。（PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA，保留所有权利）
In their recently published article,“The Voice Conveys Emotion in Ten Globalized Cultures and One Remote Village in Bhutan,” Cordaro, Keltner, Tshering, Wangchuk, and Flynn conclude that certain emotion categories are universally recognized by people around the world, barring illness and measurement error. The impact of Cordaro et al.’s article, like that of all empirical studies, is determined not only by its research findings but also by how the research findings are situated. Accuracy in characterizing the scientific context of new findings is as important as maintaining the highest standards for other aspects of the scientific method. In this regard, we point out three areas of concern in Cordaro et al.’s discussion of past research on remote samples, the use of more discovery-oriented (and less confirmatory) experimental methods in past research, and the use of manipulation checks in past research. Ultimately, a study’s contribution to scientific progress is limited when ambiguities and oversights obscure the real value of its findings.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
染色体蛋白和基因表达
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
G. Reeck;G. Goodwin;P. Puigdoménech
通讯作者：
P. Puigdoménech