Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics
Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics
复制标题
DOI：
10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
复制
发表时间：
2003-01-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Agrawal, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Agrawal, A
本文提出了一个批判性的评估领域的共同财产。在简要论述了公地研究的主要发现和成就之后，本文提出了两种批判策略。第一种友好批评的策略接受了大多数关于公共财产的著作的基本假设，以表明公地学者已经发现了比仔细分析可能更多的潜在影响资源管理的变量。该文件确定了解决变量过多问题的一些潜在手段。第二条批评路线则有所不同。它提出的问题是，如果放松对主权自我和非政治性产权制度的假设，对公共财产的分析可能会发生什么变化，以及他们需要考虑什么。我对这些问题的研究结束了这篇评论，强调需要（a）更仔细地关注主体形成的过程，（B）以更大的历史深度调查共同财产安排和相关的主体地位。
This paper presents a critical assessment of the field of common property. After discussing briefly the major findings and accomplishments of the scholarship on the commons, the paper pursues two strategies of critique. The first strategy of friendly critique accepts the basic assumptions of most writings on common property to show that scholars of commons have discovered far more variables that potentially affect resource management than is possible to analyze carefully. The paper identifies some potential means to address the problem of too many variables. The second line of critique proceeds differently. It asks how analyses of common property might change, and what they need to consider, if they loosen assumptions about sovereign selves and apolitical property rights institutions. My examination of these questions concludes this review with an emphasis on the need to (a) attend more carefully to processes of subject formation, and (b) investigate common property arrangements and associated subject positions with greater historical depth.