Sovereignty and Empire in the North Sea, 1807-1918
Sovereignty and Empire in the North Sea, 1807-1918
复制标题
北海的主权和帝国,1807-1918 年
DOI:
10.1093/ahr/119.2.313
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Rüger J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rüger J
IN FEBRUARY 1916, THEODOR Luhrs VOLUNTEERED to fight in the Great War. It was time, he felt, that he did his bit. The Australian authorities were less convinced. Certainly, they desperately needed volunteers—two new infantry divisions were to be sent to Europe, and their ranks had to be filled. Lührs fitted the bill: he was the right age and had no medical conditions. But he was also German, or so the Department of Defence thought. For six months it discussed his case with other government departments, a case in which the terms “nationality,”“loyalty,” and “empire” seemed frustratingly confficted. Lührs had been born in Heligoland, a British colony in the North Sea. In 1890, the island had been ceded to Imperial Germany. The inhabitants had been given the right to remain British subjects, which his parents had chosen not to do. But Lührs,“not liking the German rule,” had left the erstwhile crown colony to serve on British ships. In December 1910, he had claimed residence in Australia, found work, and married “a Tasmanian girl.” As far as he was concerned, he was a subject of the empire.The Australian Army disagreed. In its view, Lührs’s parents had turned from natural-born British subjects into German nationals: thus he was of “enemy alien parentage.” A number of local dignitaries wrote to protest that Lührs was “a loyal subject of the Empire” and had “no German leanings.” On the contrary, he had “always been proud to have been born under the British ffag.” 1 But the Department of External Affairs was clear:“the enlistment in the Australian Imperial Force of men of enemy parentage is not permitted.” 2 Lührs, who found this to be “an extremely awkward and unfortunate position,” continued to insist that he was not Ger-