Clinical impact of surveillance colonoscopy using magnification without diminutive polyp removal
Clinical impact of surveillance colonoscopy using magnification without diminutive polyp removal
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/den.12877
复制
发表时间:
2017-11-01
影响因子:
5.3
通讯作者:
Chayama, Kazuaki
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ninomiya, Yuki;Oka, Shiro;Chayama, Kazuaki
Background and Aim: In Western countries, endoscopic removal of all adenomas during colonoscopy is recommended. The present study evaluates the usefulness of magnifying colonoscopy without removal of diminutive (= 6 mm in size, depressed lesions, and lesions with type V pit pattern were indications for endoscopic resection. We investigated the characteristics of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection detected on surveillance colonoscopy and the risk factors for the incidence of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection.Results: A total of 706 consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty-eight lesions indicated for endoscopic resection were detected, averaging 9.0 +/- 4.8 mm, and 33 (49%) lesions were located in the right colon. Pathological diagnoses were adenoma, Tis carcinoma, and T1 carcinoma in 58 (85%), eight (12%), and two (3%) lesions, respectively. Five lesions were considered to grow from previously detected diminutive polyps. Relative risks for the incidence of a lesion indicated for endoscopic resection were 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-3.23) for males compared with females, 3.76 (95% CI, 2.03-7.50) for more than three polyps at initial colonoscopy compared with one polyp, and 2.84 (95% CI, 1.43-5.24) for patients with carcinoma at initial colonoscopy compared with patients with no lesion indicated for endoscopic resection. Nine carcinomas were resected endoscopically.Conclusion: Diminutive low-grade adenomas detected by using magnifying colonoscopy may not necessarily require removal.