The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course
The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course
复制标题
视觉听觉颜色词斯特鲁普不对称性及其时间进程
作者：
Ardi Roelofs
四项实验检查了 Stroop 任务的跨模式版本，以便 (1) 寻找颜色命名、口语命名和书面单词命名中的 Stroop 不对称性，并评估这些不对称性的时间进程，以及 (2) 将这些发现与当前的 Stroop 效应模型进行比较。参与者命名色块，同时忽略口头颜色词，其出现时间从颜色出现前 300 毫秒到颜色出现后 300 毫秒不等（实验 1），或者他们命名口头词并忽略颜色（实验 2）。次要视觉检测任务确保参与者在两项任务中都观察颜色。口头颜色词在颜色命名中产生斯特鲁普效应，但在任何刺激开始异步时，颜色不会对口头词命名产生影响。这种效果的不对称是通过相同的颜色和语音单词命名延迟获得的。书面颜色词在命名口语词时产生了斯特鲁普效应（实验 3），口语颜色词在命名书面词时产生了斯特鲁普效应（实验 4）。这些结果被解释为与颜色词斯特鲁普不对称性的建筑学解释最一致，与可区分性和路径强度解释相反。
Four experiments examined crossmodal versions of the Stroop task in order (1) to look for Stroop asymmetries in color naming, spoken-word naming, and written-word naming and to evaluate the time course of these asymmetries, and (2) to compare these findings to current models of the Stroop effect. Participants named color patches while ignoring spoken color words presented with an onset varying from 300 msec before to 300 msec after the onset of the color (Experiment 1), or they named the spoken words and ignored the colors (Experiment 2). A secondary visual detection task assured that the participants looked at the colors in both tasks. Spoken color words yielded Stroop effects in color naming, but colors did not yield an effect in spoken-word naming at any stimulus onset asynchrony. This asymmetry in effects was obtained with equivalent color- and spoken-word-naming latencies. Written color words yielded a Stroop effect in naming spoken words (Experiment 3), and spoken color words yielded an effect in naming written words (Experiment 4). These results were interpreted as most consistent with an architectural account of the color-word Stroop asymmetry, in contrast with discriminability and pathway strength accounts.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
M. Botvinick;T. Braver;D. Barch;C. Carter;J. Cohen
通讯作者：
M. Botvinick;T. Braver;D. Barch;C. Carter;J. Cohen