Screening for colorectal cancer on the front line.
Screening for colorectal cancer on the front line.
复制标题
在第一线筛查结直肠癌。
DOI:
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07360.x
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Luckmann,Roger
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lemon,StephenieC;Zapka,JaneG;Estabrook,Barbara;Erban,Stephen;Luckmann,Roger
OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, beliefs, and practices of primary care clinicians regarding colorectal cancer screening.METHODS:We surveyed 77 primary care providers in six clinics in central Massachusetts to evaluate several factors related to colorectal cancer screening.RESULTS:Most agreed with guidelines for fecal occult blood test (97%) and sigmoidoscopy (87%), which were reported commonly as usual practice. Although the majority (86%) recommended colonoscopy as a colorectal cancer screening test, it was infrequently reported as usual practice. Also, 36% considered barium enema a colorectal cancer screening option, and it was rarely reported as usual practice. Despite lack of evidence supporting effectiveness, digital rectal examinations and in-office fecal occult blood test were commonly reported as usual practice. However, these were usually reported in combination with a guideline-endorsed testing option. Although only 10% reported that fecal occult blood test/home was frequently refused, 60% reported sigmoidoscopy was. Frequently cited patient barriers to sigmoidoscopy compliance included fear the procedure would hurt and that patients assume symptoms occur if there is a problem. Perceptions of health systems barriers to sigmoidoscopy were less strong.CONCLUSIONS:Most providers recommended guideline-endorsed colorectal cancer screening. However, patient refusal for sigmoidoscopy was common. Results indicate that multiple levels of intervention, including patient and provider education and systems strategies, may help increase prevalence.