AS A BASIS FOR
AS A BASIS FOR
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
F. Cahn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Cahn
荣耀主要是社会影响是否与经济上的成功相匹配。雅典现在拥有基础设施的遗产，举办奥运会可能会产生利润，但这种利润可能不会惠及所有企业。由于其“gpeeial”性质，大型体育赛事不再像往常一样成为生活的一部分，所有这些都可能在当地水平造成破坏。从经济角度看，所在城市的企业之间将存在“赢家和输家”。奥运会前后的经济影响评估中可能没有提到这一点。这种解释并不意味着经济影响评估是错误的，只是过于宽泛。对于赚钱或亏钱的雅典企业来说，没有一个人太高兴或太悲伤。有
whether the glory mainly a social impact was quite as successfu11y matehed economically. Athens now has a legacy of infrastructure and hosting the Games may have produced a profit but probably tihis profit did not extend to all businesses, By their "gpeeial" nature, sporting mega'events are not part oflife as usual, alld can be disruptive at the local evel. Economically, there wil} be "winners and losers" among businesses in the hest city. Probably there was no mention ofthis in the Olympics' pre' or post'event economic impact assessments, This gloss does not mean tihe economic impact assessments are wrong, but simply too broad'brush. No ene was like}y too happy, or too sad, for the Athens' busineBses that made or lost money. Has