Methodology as a Knife Fight: The Process, Politics and Paradox of Evaluating Surveillance
Methodology as a Knife Fight: The Process, Politics and Paradox of Evaluating Surveillance
复制标题
方法论就像一场刀战：评估监控的过程、政治和悖论
DOI：
10.1007/s10612-009-9083-y
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Kevin D. Haggerty
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kevin D. Haggerty
本文使用一个不受管制的战斗的比喻，检查有关监督措施的评价研究的修辞政治。它概述了如何，除了在社会科学辩论的标准票价，方法论问题有一个平行存在的一部分，监视和犯罪控制的修辞政治。在简要概述了一些方法，倡导者试图强调方法上的关注，试图破坏他们的对手的立场，本文认为某些群体是如何在这种交流中相对落后和处于不利地位。最后一节从更大的角度来看待这些动态，以解决参与这种话语政治风格所固有的一些风险。
This paper uses the analogy of an unregulated fight to examine the rhetorical politics of evaluation research pertaining to surveillance measures. It outlines how, in addition to being standard fare in social scientific debates, methodological issues have a parallel existence as part of the rhetorical politics of surveillance and crime control. After briefly sketching some of the ways that advocates try and accentuate methodological concerns in attempts to undermine the position of their adversary the paper considers how certain groups are comparatively advantaged and disadvantaged in such exchanges. The concluding section takes a larger view of these dynamics to address some of the risks inherent in engaging in this style of discursive politics.