Origin of concept of ischaemic heart disease.
Origin of concept of ischaemic heart disease.
复制标题
缺血性心脏病概念的起源。
DOI:
10.1136/hrt.50.3.209
复制
发表时间:
1983
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
W. Proudfit
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Proudfit
Geographic designations sometimes have been given to diseases such as the great pox, febrile conditions, diarrhoeas, anaemias, and itches, often in a pejorative sense by those in other nations, often unjustly. A just appellation would be "British disease" for ischaemic heart disease, because of the origin of the concept. William Heberden was a prominent London physician when he described angina pectoris at a meeting of the College of Physicians in 1768. This classic description left little to be added from the standpoint of symptoms. Sudden death was mentioned as a complication. Heberden's practice was not hospital-based, so he had limited opportunity for postmortem examination of patients who had experienced the condition, or perhaps he seldom was consulted during the terminal illness. His paper on angina pectoris was published in 1772.1 A popular magazine for the scholarly, Critical Review, published a complete account of Heberden's contribution in its March 1772 issue.2 An interested reader recognised his symptoms as those described and noted that Heberden did not know the cause of the syndrome. The next month he wrote an appreciative letter to Dr Heberden in which he stated he had "never troubled myself much about the cause of it, but attributed it to an obstruction of the circulation or a species of rheumatism".3 He followed this remarkable speculation by a request that Heberden arrange a postmortem examination on his body, "if it please God to take me away suddenly". The letter was signed "Unknown" and less than three weeks later, early in May, Heberden was notified that the writer had died suddenly. He arranged for John Hunter, the great anatomist, pathologist, and surgeon, to do the examination. At the time, Edward Jenner was nearing the end of a two year term as a resident in Hunter's home and student of the master, and he attended the postmortem examination.4 Hunter found nothing to account for angina pectoris. In November of the same year Heberden reported to the College of Physicians that, "Since it was not due owing to any malconformation, or morbid destruction of parts necessary to life, we need not despair of finding a cure." The identity of Heberden's "Unknown" corres-