Contribution of the Semiological Approach to Deixis-Anaphora in Sign Language: The Key Role of Eye-Gaze.

Contribution of the Semiological Approach to Deixis-Anaphora in Sign Language: The Key Role of Eye-Gaze.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583763
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Sallandre MA
Sallandre MA
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Garcia B;Sallandre MA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了手语语篇中的指示回指现象,着重探讨了目光注视在其中的作用。根据符号学的研究方法,源语的结构化源于对视觉-手势模态的最大化利用,这导致了两种意义产生模式,这取决于签名者的符号意图。涉及非手动和手动参数,第一种模式,表达意图说,同时显示,使用基于结构的结构,被称为“转移结构”。第二类是表达说而不示的意图,包括词汇、指和指法等单位。为了使我们的描述性概念与那些像我们一样采用认知功能主义观点的SL语言学家所使用的描述性概念相一致,我们揭示了我们的方法的特定理论基础,即“表达理论”。“表达”的概念对于理解凝视的作用具有决定性意义,因为它是指示语的基础,是二语语篇中指称生成和跟踪的关键载体。“吐字”包含“吐字”和“言语”两个领域的对立。第一个链接,作为共同声明者,签名者/发言者和他/她的收件人,通过“声明行为”将他们确立为第一和第二人称。第二种是内部的话语产生。在几个SL(一些没有历史联系)的叙述语料库的基础上,我们说明了眼睛凝视的重要作用和它所实现的功能的多样性。我们的分析,从这个角度来看,证明了SL之间的多个结构相似性,特别是在传输结构。这一结果有力地支持了我们的方法,即,这些结构是共同的所有SL的类型学假设。因此,我们表明,发音分析的基础上,在这些视觉语言,SL的眼睛注视的关键作用,是能够给自己的语言经济,特别是最简单的帐户,在这些语言中的指示回指。
We address the issue of deixis–anaphora in sign language (SL) discourse, focusing on the role of eye-gaze. According to the Semiological Approach, SL structuring stems from a maximum exploitation of the visuo-gestural modality, which results in two modes of meaning production, depending on the signer’s semiotic intent. Involving both non-manual and manual parameters, the first mode, expressing the intent to say while showing, uses constructions based on structures, the termed “transfer structures.” The second one, expressing the intent to say without showing, involves lexical, pointing and fingerspelling units. In order to situate our descriptive concepts with respect to those used by SL linguists who, like us, adopt a cognitive–functionalist perspective, we expose a specific theoretical foundation of our approach, the “enunciation theories.” The concept of “enunciation” is decisive for understanding the role of eye-gaze, as being at the foundation of deixis and the key vector of referential creation and tracking in SL discourse. “Enunciation” entails the opposition between “Enunciation” and “Utterance” Domains. The first links, as co-enunciators, the signer/speaker and his/her addressee, establishing them by the very “act of enunciation” as 1st and 2nd person. The second is internal to the discourse produced. Grounding on corpora of narratives in several SLs (some with no historical link), we illustrate this crucial role of eye-gaze and the diversity of functions it fulfills. Our analyses, carried out in this perspective, attest to the multiple structural similarities between SLs, particularly with regard to transfer structures. This result strongly supports the typological hypothesis underlying our approach, namely, that these structures are common to all SLs. We thus show that an enunciative analysis, based on the key role of eye-gaze in these visual languages that are SLs, is able to give the simplest account of their own linguistic economy and, in particular, of deixis–anaphora in these languages.
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002
发表时间: 2013-09-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Cormier, Kearsy;Smith, Sandra;Zwets, Martine
通讯作者: Zwets, Martine
DOI: 10.1017/s0022226700011567
发表时间: 1988-03-01
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
ARIEL, M
通讯作者: ARIEL, M