Racial Diversity Among American Cardiologists: Implications for the Past, Present, and Future.
Racial Diversity Among American Cardiologists: Implications for the Past, Present, and Future.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1161/circulationaha.121.053566
复制
发表时间:
2021-06-15
期刊:
影响因子:
37.8
通讯作者:
South-Paul, Jeannette E.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Johnson, Amber E.;Talabi, Mehret Birru;Bonifacino, Eliana;Culyba, Alison J.;Davis, Esa M.;Davis, Paula K.;De Castro, Laura M.;Essien, Utibe R.;Gonzaga, Alda Maria;Hogan, MaCalus, V;James, Alaina J.;Jonassaint, Charles R.;Jonassaint, Naudia L.;Matheo, Loreta;Nance, Melonie A.;Napoe, G. Sarah;Olafiranye, Oladipupo;Owusu-Ansah, Sylvia;Pierson-Brown, Tomar N.;Smith, A. J. Conrad;Suber, Tomeka L.;Torres, Orquidia;Tripp, Rickquel;Ufomata, Eloho;Wilson, J. Deanna;South-Paul, Jeannette E.
In the United States, race-based disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) care have proven to be pervasive, deadly, and expensive. African American/Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Native/Indigenous American individuals are at increased risk of CVD and are less likely to receive high-quality, evidence-based medical care as compared with their White American counterparts. Although the United States population is diverse, the cardiovascular workforce that provides its much-needed care lacks diversity. The available data show that care provided by physicians from racial minority backgrounds is associated with better quality, both for racial minority patients as well as for majority patients. Not only is cardiovascular workforce diversity associated with improvements in healthcare quality, but racial diversity among academic teams and research scientists is linked with research quality. We outline documented barriers to achieving workforce diversity and suggest evidence-based strategies to overcome these barriers. Key strategies to enhance racial diversity in cardiology include improving recruitment and retention of racially diverse members of the cardiology workforce and focusing on cardiovascular health equity for patients. This review draws attention to academic institutions, but the implications should be considered relevant for non-academic and community settings as well.