Domain, scope and degree of happiness

Domain, scope and degree of happiness
复制标题

幸福的领域、范围和程度

DOI:
10.1111/j.2044-8309.1983.tb00589.x
复制
发表时间:
1983
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
W. Grichting
W. Grichting
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Grichting

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作为生活质量研究的一部分,在汤斯维尔的幸福结构进行了研究,通过Cantril的自锚量表。对幸福和不幸福的基本原理的分析表明,幸福-不幸福的结构是一维和双极的,而不是多维的。所谓的原因和公开的幸福程度进行了分析与古德曼的对数线性分析的名义数据的帮助。研究结果表明,主观幸福感的程度与规定的原因之间并不是线性关系。同样,追求幸福的动机的一致性与幸福的程度并不是线性相关的,这表明罪人和圣徒都可以同样(不)幸福。幸福的个体以女性的形象出现,已婚,成熟,天性保守。在这项研究中,幸福个人的理想类型并不符合威尔逊20年前的观察,但符合国外最近的研究结果,特别是在传统的社会幸福指标中。
As part of the quality of life study in Townsville the happiness construct was studied by means of Cantril's self-anchoring scale. The analysis of the rationales for happiness and unhappiness suggested that the happiness-unhappiness construct is unidimensional and bipolar rather than multidimensional. Alleged causes and avowed degree of happiness were analysed with the help of Goodman's log-linear analysis for nominal data. It was concluded that the degree of subjective happiness is not linearly related to the stipulated causes. Similarly, the consistency of motives for the pursuit of happiness is not linearly related to the degree of happiness, suggesting that both sinners and saints can be equally (un)happy. The happy individual emerges as female, married, of mature age and conservative in nature. In this study the ideal type of the happy individual does not conform with Wilson's observations of 20 years ago but fits more recent findings from overseas, particularly within the tradition of indicators of social well-being.