Examining the relation between ratings of executive functioning and academic achievement: Findings from a cross-cultural study
Examining the relation between ratings of executive functioning and academic achievement: Findings from a cross-cultural study
复制标题
检验执行功能评级与学业成绩之间的关系：跨文化研究的结果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Mohammadi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Thorell;Alberto Veleiro;Angela F. Y. Siu;H. Mohammadi
本研究调查了来自四个国家（瑞典、西班牙、伊朗和中国）的 6 至 11 岁儿童的学业成绩与执行功能评分之间的关系。家长和老师使用儿童执行功能量表（CHEXI）对执行功能进行评级。结果显示，与其他样本相比，中国样本普遍被认为具有更多的执行缺陷。中国行政职能缺陷加剧的发现很可能是文化偏见的结果。与女孩相比，男孩的执行功能普遍被认为较差，但在伊朗除外，那里的父母（而不是老师）认为女孩的执行功能比男孩较差。然而，在伊朗发现的这种相反的结果模式不太可能反映执行功能中真正的性别差异。尽管各国的执行功能水平存在一些差异，但除中国的 CHEXI 家长评分外，CHEXI 的抑制和工作记忆分量表均与所有四个国家的学业成绩相关。总而言之，结果表明，CHEXI 可以用作早期学业困难的筛选措施，尽管显然必须考虑文化偏见。
The present study investigated the relation between academic performance and ratings of executive functioning in children aged 6–11 from four countries: Sweden, Spain, Iran, and China. Ratings of executive functioning were made by both parents and teachers using the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI). The results showed that the Chinese sample was generally rated as having more executive deficits compared to the other samples. The finding that executive functioning deficits are exacerbated in China is most likely the result of cultural biases. Boys were generally rated as having poorer executive functioning compared to girls, except in Iran where parents, but not teachers, rated girls as having poorer executive functioning compared to boys. However, this opposite pattern of results found for Iran is not likely to reflect true gender differences in executive functioning. Despite some differences in the levels of executive functioning across countries, both the inhibition and working memory subscales of the CHEXI were related to academic achievement in all four countries, except for CHEXI parent ratings in China. Altogether, the results indicate that the CHEXI may be used as a screening measure for early academic difficulties, although cultural biases clearly have to be taken into consideration.
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Biederman, J;Monuteaux, MC;Faraone, SV
通讯作者：
Faraone, SV