Hearing by Bone Conduction and the Use of Bone-Conduction Hearing Aids
Hearing by Bone Conduction and the Use of Bone-Conduction Hearing Aids
复制标题
骨导听力和骨导助听器的使用
DOI:
10.1177/003591575204501110
复制
发表时间:
1952
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
P. H. Strange
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chairman;J. J. Knight;P. H. Strange
THE exact nature of the communication of sound to the inner ear by bone conduction is somewhat obscure although the experimental work of Bekesy (1932), Barany (1938) and others offers suggestions of possible explanations of this means of stimulation. The relationship of the "occlusion" effect as observed when the meatus is plugged externally and internally and the effect of restriction of the conductive mechanism is discussed. It is suggested that in normal subjects and patients with perceptive deafness hearing by bone-conductor stimulation occurs virtually by means of the normal air-conduction mechanism due to the inertia of the free ossicular chain. In conductive deafness stimulation may be by direct excitation of the bony structure of the cochlea with the inertia of the cochlear fluid operative if the round window is unobstructed. In advanced stages of otosclerosis the obstruction of both windows would be expected to indicate an apparent perceptive element, i.e. a lowered bone-conduction audiogram. An account is given of experiments relating to the communication of sound from one ear to the other. When sound from a telephone receiver is applied to one ear the level of sound communicated to the other ear known as "cross-hearing" depends on the mode of application and the type of receiver. For a bone-conduction receiver applied to the mastoid there is in general very little difference in the level of sound reaching the two ears over the frequency range 250 to 2000 c/s. In the case of sound applied by an air-conduction receiver the communication of sound by "cross-hearing" suffers a reduction of 45 to 50 db. for an external receiver and 75 to 80 db. for an insert receiver. The importance of masking when making bone-conduction tests is emphasized and it is suggested that the application of the masking noise is accomplished most efficiently by means of an insert form of receiver. The usefulness of bone-conduction hearing aids and the conditions under which their application is superior or preferable to air-conduction types is discussed.