Authenticating Oral and Memory Variants in Ancient Hebrew Literature
Authenticating Oral and Memory Variants in Ancient Hebrew Literature
复制标题
验证古希伯来文学中的口头和记忆变体
DOI：
10.1093/jss/fgy050
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
0.2
通讯作者：
Tooman W
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tooman W
本文的目的是考虑在古代希伯来文学的口头和记忆变体的认证。我比较了与听力或记忆的抄写错误相关的文本差异类型，以及经常发生在其他两种文本复制中的文本差异类型-引用和圣经内部引用。相异是引文和引用的规范，由引文和引用产生的相异类型与通常被识别为听觉或记忆变体的相异类型相同。一个作者，把同样的话语放在两个人物的嘴里（或者在一个人物的嘴里放两次），通常会使这个话语有所不同。如果说有什么不同的话，那就是圣经内部引用的特征。这是一个警告，提醒人们不要轻易地就相异的原因或它们所暗示的回忆过程得出结论，并警告人们不要高估圣经和第二圣殿文学中口头和心理特征的存在和意义。
The purpose of this essay is to consider the authentication of oral and memory variants in ancient Hebrew literature. I compare types of textual dissimilarity that are associated with scribal errors of hearing or memory with types of dissimilarity that occur regularly in two other types of textual reproduction — quotations and inner-biblical citations. Dissimilarity is the norm with quotations and citations, and the types of dissimilarity generated by quotations and citations are identical to types of dissimilarity that are commonly identified as aural or memory-variants. An author, placing the same utterance in the mouths of two characters (or twice in the mouth of single character) will typically render that utterance with difference. Difference is, if anything, even more characteristic of inner-biblical citations. This serves as a note of caution about too readily drawing conclusions regarding the causes of dissimilarity or the process of recall implied by them and cautions against overestimating the presence and significance of oral and mental features in biblical and Second Temple literature.