Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/hel.12475
复制
发表时间:
2018-04-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Lu, Nong Hua
Lu, Nong Hua
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu, Wen Zhong;Xie, Yong;Lu, Nong Hua

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景自2012年《第四次中国幽门螺杆菌感染管理共识报告》发表以来,(关于幽门螺杆菌胃炎的京都全球共识报告,成人幽门螺杆菌感染治疗和幽门螺杆菌感染管理的多伦多共识(马斯特里赫特V/佛罗伦萨共识报告)资料与方法采用德尔菲法对相关文献进行分析,以建立相关文献的共识。首先,通过电子邮件将既定声明发送给专家。第二,经过两轮磋商,初步声明在2016年12月16日的会议上进行了面对面的讨论和逐项修改。最后,21名与会核心成员参加了发言的最后表决。每个声明的投票是使用一个电子系统进行的,在屏幕上显示的协议水平在真实的time.ResultsConsensus内容共包含48个声明和相关的6个部分,包括H。幽门螺杆菌根除、诊断、治疗、H. pylori与胃癌、H. pylori感染的特殊人群,H.幽门螺杆菌和胃肠道菌群。ConclusionsRecommendations的基础上提供的最佳证据。
BackgroundSince the Fourth Chinese National Consensus Report on the management of H.pylori infection' was published in 2012, three important consensuses (Kyoto global consensus report on H.pylori gastritis, The Toronto Consensus for the Treatment of H.pylori Infection in Adults and Management of H.pylori infectionthe Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report) have been published regarding the management of H.pylori infection.Materials and MethodsA Delphi method was adopted to develop the consensus of relevant statements'. First, the established statements' were sent to experts via email. Second, after undergoing two rounds of consultation, the initial statements were discussed face to face and revised in the conference item by item on 16 December 2016. Finally, 21 core members of conferees participated in the final vote of statements. Voting for each statement was performed using an electronic system with levels of agreements shown on the screen in real time.ResultsConsensus contents contained a total of 48 statements and related 6 parts, including indications for H. pylori eradication, diagnosis, treatment, H. pylori and gastric cancer, H. pylori infection in special populations, H. pylori and gastrointestinal microbiota.ConclusionsRecommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence.