Ego control, Ego resiliency, and the Five-Factor Model as predictors of behavioral and emotional problems in clinic-referred children and adolescents.

Ego control, Ego resiliency, and the Five-Factor Model as predictors of behavioral and emotional problems in clinic-referred children and adolescents.
复制标题

自我控制、自我弹性和五因素模型作为临床转诊儿童和青少年行为和情绪问题的预测因素。

DOI:
10.1037//0021-843x.106.3.404
复制
发表时间:
1997
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Weisz,JR
Weisz,JR
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
HueyJr,SJ;Weisz,JR

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对116名门诊儿童的自我控制(EC)、自我复原力(ER)和人格五因素模型(FFM)与行为和情绪问题的关系进行了探讨。在EC-ER模型中,自我控制不足对外化问题的预测作用最大,而自我脆性(内隐记忆的相对缺失)和自我控制不足对内化问题的预测作用相当。在FFM中,外向性和宜人性是外化问题的独立预测因子,而只有神经质才能预测内化问题。当EC-ER模型与FFM进行对比测试时,后者似乎在预测外在性问题而不是内在性问题方面优于前者;当检查临床综合征组时,两种人格模型的维度对于有原发内在性、外部性或并存问题的儿童具有不同的显著意义。(心理信息数据库记录(C)2022年APA,保留所有权利)
The relations of Ego control (EC), Ego resiliency (ER), and the Five-Factor Model of Personality (FFM) with behavioral and emotional problems were explored among 116 clinic-referred children. Within the EC-ER model, Ego undercontrol was most important in predicting externalizing problems, and both Ego brittleness (the relative absence of ER) and Ego undercontrol made equal contributions to predicting internalizing problems. Within the FFM, Extraversion and Agreeableness were independent predictors of externalizing problems, whereas only Neuroticism predicted internalizing problems. When the EC-ER model was tested against the FFM, the latter model appeared to outperform the former in predicting externalizing but not internalizing problems; when clinical syndrome groups were examined, dimensions from both personality models were differentially salient for children with primary internalizing, externalizing, or comorbid problems.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)