Filled and empty motor reproductions of filled and empty intervals: Is there also a filled - reproduction illusion?
Filled and empty motor reproductions of filled and empty intervals: Is there also a filled - reproduction illusion?
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13414-017-1370-1
复制
发表时间：
2017-10-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Schroeter, Hannes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bratzke, Daniel;Birngruber, Teresa;Schroeter, Hannes
先前的研究表明，在相同的持续时间内，被填满的间隔被认为比空的间隔更长（即，被填满的持续时间错觉）。在目前的研究中，我们询问填充和空复制（单次连续按键与两次离散按键）中涉及的运动动作是否会以类似的方式影响时间估计。我们假设，相同持续时间间隔的再现在充满时应该比空再现短（即，充满再现的错觉）。在两个实验中，参与者使用填充和空的复制来复制填充和空的间隔（范围从400到1600毫秒）。结果为这两种错觉都提供了证据，尽管这种证据对于充满持续时间的错觉比充满繁殖的错觉更清晰。目前的研究表明，在两种错觉协同工作的情况下，根据间隔和复制类型的组合，相同间隔的复制可能会发生巨大变化。
Previous studies have demonstrated that filled intervals are perceived as being longer than empty intervals of the same duration (i.e., the filled - duration illusion). In the present study, we asked whether the motor actions involved in filled and empty reproductions (a single continuous key press vs. two discrete key presses) would affect time estimates in a similar way. We hypothesized that reproductions of intervals of the same duration should be shorter for filled than empty reproductions (i.e., a filled - reproduction illusion). In two experiments, participants reproduced filled and empty intervals (ranging from 400 to 1,600 ms) using filled and empty reproductions. The results provided evidence for both kinds of illusions, even though the evidence was clearer for the filled - duration than for the filled - reproduction illusion. The present study demonstrates that in a situation in which both illusions work in concert, reproductions of the same interval can vary dramatically depending on the combination of interval and reproduction type.